Interrogating differences: A comparative analysis of Africa’s informal settlements

Abstract

Urban development in Africa is a very diverse and ambivalent phenomenon with aspects that do not fall neatly into global standards. Informal settlements therefore challenge governance by standards. We argue that quantifying and interrogating differences offers a better basis for governance. By drawing on a comparative analysis of three different informal settlements in Sub-Saharan Africa, this paper explores what differences reveal about the governance of informal settlements. The paper uses an urban societal metabolism approach, focussed on gender, energy and health, based on questionnaires and focus group discussions in Enkanini (Stellenbosch, South Africa), Mathare (Nairobi, Kenya), and Kasubi-Kawaala (Kampala, Uganda). The contribution of the paper is both empirical and theoretical. Empirically, we provide new evidence about the metabolism of urban informality at multiple levels of analysis: the individual, the household and the settlement. Findings show the gender asymmetries in urban poverty and the intricate links between energy choices, health and economic status. Theoretically, we argue that different levels of analysis produce different understandings of urban informality, and that analyzing informal settlements only by population aggregates means missing information. We conclude by arguing that understanding differences leads to the formulation of modest and localised goals, which are better able to take into account the complexity of urban informality.

Building capacity towards what? Proposing a framework for the analysis of energy transition governance in the context of urban informality in Sub-Saharan Africa

“…This policy is not directed at informal settlements but closely affects informal settlement dwellers. Charcoal is used for cooking and heating among lower income households and is the second most used fuel in informal settlements in Nairobi, after paraffin (Kovacic et al 2019). As a result, the ban of charcoal creates a problem for the urban poor with implications for social justice.…”

“…An example of this framing is statistics that report that Africa accounts for one-fifth of the world's population but for less than 4% of global electricity consumption (The Economist 2019). If urban informality is seen as a way of life, the use of paraffin and charcoal should rather be understood as affording flexibility in repurposing cooking stoves (Kovacic et al 2019). In the latter case, energy is part of the informal way of life.…”

The State of the Art of Gendered Energy Innovations: A Structured Literature Review

“…In the literature, gender was found to play a significant role in entrepreneurship and access to electricity [14,15], economic growth [29], and energy policy and organisational practices [32]. The interconnectedness of the spheres in which gender plays a significant role reinforces the fact that excluding gendered considerations in innovation could be detrimental to other sustainability efforts.…”

“…inequalities and the lack of access to sustainable energy practices are disproportionately affecting women in the developing world [3,14,15].…”

Contributing to the achievement of sustainable development goals: knowledge on water, sanitation and health risk in Cotonou and Lomé cities

“…The (ISC) (2020) explains that African cities have a unique but often overlooked capacity to innovate and experiment with solutions for sustainability. These cities often include complex but agile informal settlements and multiple ecologies with resources that offer alternative pathways to the implementation of the global development agenda (Buyana 2019;Kovacic et al 2019). Urama et al (2014) reported that Benin already has policies, strategy and action plans on sustainable development issues in areas, such as water and the environment.…”