Post-Colonial and Post-Partition South Asia South Asia as a post-colonial as well as a post-partition region has a lot to offer to those interested in the geopolitical triad of bordering, ordering and othering (van Houtum and van Naerssen 2002). Several of these practicesthat feed into and are in turn fed by boundary producing formal and popular narrativescontinue to unfold on a subcontinent that eminently qualifies as ecologically-geographically connected but remains geopolitically partitioned, and are yet to be theorized. The Janus-faced nature of South Asian borderlandsthe inward nationalizing inclinations entangled with the outward regional frontier-orientationsare a stark reminder of the reality that is often overlooked: the history of mobility in this part of the world is much older than the history of territoriality. The geopolitical triad or triangle mentioned above (i.e. bordering, ordering and othering) comes with a heavy price tag for the inhabitants of the sub-continent, especially for those communities whose homeland landed in a suddenly erupted borderland in the wake of the 1947 partition of British India, which caused the death of nearly one million people and more than ten million were displaced. Whose territory was being partitioned in 1947 (Chaturvedi 2005) is a question that remains unanswered even today. It is useful to acknowledge at the outset that contemporary South Asia is, paradoxically, both a rich and poor region due to the mismatch between opportunities and capacities. It is a region where people across borders are culturally and socially interrelated but this commonality is not reflected in state-to-state relations of two nuclear powers-India and Pakistan. South Asia is both one of the fastest-growing and one of the least integrated regions of the world. It is also a region of contrasts, marked by both optimism and pessimism and features many intricacies. This dichotomy of strength and weakness, security and insecurity, hope and fear with connections and disconnects is a remarkable, if not unusual, feature of South Asia and gives birth to borders and boundaries with different kinds of territoriality. Some of the enduring legacies of this partition include truncated territories, economies, cultures and unforgettable memories. As pointed out by Ranabir Samaddar (2005, 95), there was "[N]ot one partition, not even two, not even three … but several partitions … partitions of several territories, several units, several identities and several visions". How does one capture the idea of South Asia? On its radical side, social theorist Ashis Nandy would even question the idea of South Asia. For Nandy,