2022
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.2c00149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrogating RNA–Small Molecule Interactions with Structure Probing and Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Molecular Simulations

Abstract: While there is increasing interest in the study of RNA as a therapeutic target, efforts to understand RNA-ligand recognition at the molecular level lag far behind our understanding of protein−ligand recognition. This problem is complicated due to the more than 10 orders of magnitude in time scales involved in RNA dynamics and ligand binding events, making it not straightforward to design experiments or simulations. Here, we make use of artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented molecular dynamics simulations to di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…48 Disagreement between the results of SHAPE and another method has been seen previously; the Tte-PreQ 1 riboswitch did not show an altered SHAPE signature for synthetic ligand binding despite a change in RNA flexibility suggested by molecular dynamics simulations. 49 The inconsistency between our results suggests that SHAPE may not be ideal for screening weakly binding compounds during initial phases of discovery of an RNA targeting compound. These observations highlight the utility of parallel approaches to assess binding in novel systems.…”
Section: Binding By Cbl Derivatives Does Not Yield Shapementioning
confidence: 68%
“…48 Disagreement between the results of SHAPE and another method has been seen previously; the Tte-PreQ 1 riboswitch did not show an altered SHAPE signature for synthetic ligand binding despite a change in RNA flexibility suggested by molecular dynamics simulations. 49 The inconsistency between our results suggests that SHAPE may not be ideal for screening weakly binding compounds during initial phases of discovery of an RNA targeting compound. These observations highlight the utility of parallel approaches to assess binding in novel systems.…”
Section: Binding By Cbl Derivatives Does Not Yield Shapementioning
confidence: 68%
“…A summary of the MetaD parameters of all the simulations is provided in Table S1 in the ESI. Similar parameters were used in protein-ligand or RNA-ligand MetaD simulations 42,[73][74][75][76] . The convergence of the simulations was assessed by estimating the free energy difference between the bound state (d between 2 Å and 18 Å) and the unbound state (d greater than 25 Å).…”
Section: Nanoscale Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Disagreement between the results of SHAPE and another method has been seen previously; the Tte-PreQ1 riboswitch did not show an altered SHAPE signature for synthetic ligand binding despite a change in RNA flexibility suggested by molecular dynamics simulations. 50 The inconsistency between our results suggests that SHAPE may not be ideal for screening weakly binding compounds during initial phases of discovery of an RNA targeting compound. These observations highlight the utility of parallel approaches to assess binding in novel systems.…”
Section: Fluorescence Displacement Reveals Binding Undetected By Shapementioning
confidence: 99%