1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80315-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interruption of and harassment during copulation by stumptail macaques, Macaca arctoides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The squawks produced by Tibetan macaque males during copulations are similar to the squeak‐like ejaculation calls reported in other macaques [Formosan macaque, Hsu et al, ; rhesus macaque, Hauser, ; Manson, ; bonnet macaque, Hohmann, ; lion‐tailed macaque, Hohmann & Herzog, ], with the exception of one of the only terrestrial species, the stump‐tailed macaque. In the latter species, males make rhythmic pants and have more harsh calls in their repertoire with a limited use of coo calls similar to the terrestrial Barbary macaque [Bruce & Estep, ; Fischer & Hammerschmidt, ]. Although the squawk call type has similar analogues in other macaques, Tibetan macaque males seem to be unique in that they emit squawks during copulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The squawks produced by Tibetan macaque males during copulations are similar to the squeak‐like ejaculation calls reported in other macaques [Formosan macaque, Hsu et al, ; rhesus macaque, Hauser, ; Manson, ; bonnet macaque, Hohmann, ; lion‐tailed macaque, Hohmann & Herzog, ], with the exception of one of the only terrestrial species, the stump‐tailed macaque. In the latter species, males make rhythmic pants and have more harsh calls in their repertoire with a limited use of coo calls similar to the terrestrial Barbary macaque [Bruce & Estep, ; Fischer & Hammerschmidt, ]. Although the squawk call type has similar analogues in other macaques, Tibetan macaque males seem to be unique in that they emit squawks during copulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual interference (SI), which is defined as any disturbance directed at a mating pair by other individuals [Nishida, 1997], has been reported in several species of prosimians, New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, and apes [Brereton, 1994; Bruce & Estep, 1992; Dixson, 1998; Gouzoules, 1974; Henzi & Barrett, 2003; Kitchen et al, 2009; Manson, 1992; Niemeyer & Anderson, 1983; Smuts, 1987; van Schaik et al, 2004; Wasser, 1983]. Interference behavior can take several forms, including highly aggressive acts such as fighting, chasing, and threatening that serve to terminate mating activities (sexual interruption) as well as milder forms of interference such as touching, sniffing, playing with or climbing on the copulating pair (sexual harassment) [Bruce & Estep, 1992] that result in a reduced likelihood of mating to ejaculation. Sexual coercion also may be viewed as a type of precopulatory interference behavior, especially if it results in restricting a female's access to potential mating partners during her periovulatory period [Manson, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of chacma baboons ( Papio ursinus ), for example, high ranking males were found to direct aggressive attacks at estrous females in an attempt to prevent them from mating with lower ranking resident males and nonresident males [Kitchen et al, 2009]. Alternatively, males may compete directly with each other to monopolize access to fertile females by exhibiting high levels of intra‐sexual intolerance and aggression, especially during the breeding season [Bruce & Estep, 1992; Dixson, 1998; Dunbar, 2000; Kummer, 1968; Pradhan & van Schaik, 2008; Preuschoft & Paul, 2000]. SI as a form of intra‐sexual reproductive competition among female primates has received less attention [Clutton‐Brock, 2009; Emery Thompson et al, 2008] despite the fact that in several taxa females attempt to gain reproductive advantages and control the mating opportunities of other females through ovulatory suppression [i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentages of disrupted interactions, both total and per age class, were lower than in the northern species (COX & LE BOEUF 1977). In Primates rate of disruption seems to be linked to rank per se, and not to specific individual traits (BRUCE & ESTEP 1992), while in both species of elephant seals tendency and capability to disrupt varied also between high ranking males. Disruptors were older, more mature and more dominant than disrupted males, who usually were subadults, and disruption usually happened near harems, while interactions with isolated females were disrupted less frequently.…”
Section: Protest and Disruption Of Mating Attemptsmentioning
confidence: 69%