Intersectionality: From Theory to Practice

Abstract

Intersectionality as a framework and praxis has gathered significance in law and the social sciences over the past 20 years. This article begins by reviewing how intersectionality has been conceptualized, as well as the implications of varying definitions attributed to intersectionality. We then explore applications of intersectionality, first in research that focuses on uncovering processes of differentiation and systems of inequality across a range of topics, including reproductive rights, colonization, religion, immigration, and political behavior. After examining these processes and systems, we turn to a second research approach that focuses on categories of difference and between-category relationships. We find that despite different views on conceptualization, application, and implications, intersectionality may nevertheless open new avenues of inquiry for scholars as well as opportunities for transformative coalition building in social movements and grassroots organizations.

Racism, Health, and Politics: Advancing Interdisciplinary Knowledge

“…Intersectional analyses are also essential. Intersectional perspectives account for the experiences of multiple social identities and positionalities (e.g., class, gender, sexuality), identities that are multiplicative, not additive (Al-Faham, Davis and Ernst 2019;Crenshaw 1991;Michener, Dilts and Cohen 2012). Finally, the multiracial population in the United States is often omitted from studies of racism, health, and politics.…”

Bringing Intersectionality to Cardiovascular Health Research in Canada

“…Intersectionality acknowledges the various identities that each of us carries, and how these identities intersect to bring about either oppression or privilege (7,8). As individuals, we are socially known by our identities, such as our: age, gender, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, religion, social class, immigration status, place of residence (rural/ urban) etc.…”

Researching American Muslims: A Case Study of Surveillance and Racialized State Control

“…Likewise, when I interviewed co-ethnic Arab Americans partnered with Black American co-religionists, participants confided experiences navigating the stigmatization of interracial relationships. However, heading into research, I anticipated the presence of internal cleavages because there is a vast literature in American politics that evaluates how different dimensions of group identity (e.g., race, class, gender) can influence internal dynamics both within and across groups (Cohen 1999;Rogers 2006;Jordan-Zachary 2007;Strolovitch 2007;Hancock 2011;Smith 2013;Greer 2013;Capers and Smith 2015;Adam 2017;Bunyasi andSmith 2019, Al-Faham, Davis, andErnst 2019).…”