1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00042175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific crossability among four species of Vigna food legumes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, ploidy level was also not reported to affect crossability as crosses were obtained successfully between diploid × tetraploid ( V. radiata × V. glabrescens ) (Chen et al 1989 ;Krishnan and De 1968 ) and tetraploid × diploid ( V. glabrescens × V. umbellata ) Vigna species. Postfertilization barriers of varying degrees have also been reported in most of the interspecifi c Vigna crosses (Dana 1964 ;Biswas and Dana 1975 ;Machado et al 1982 ;Chen et al 1983 ;Al-Yasiri and Coyne 1966 ;Bharathi et al 2006 ;Pandiyan et al 2010 ;Chaisan et al 2013 ). These affect the successful recovery of desirable recombinants through development of shriveled hybrid seed with reduced or no germination (hybrid inviability), development of dwarf and non-vigorous plants and death of F 1 plants at critical stages of development (hybrid lethality).…”
Section: Crossability Barriersmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, ploidy level was also not reported to affect crossability as crosses were obtained successfully between diploid × tetraploid ( V. radiata × V. glabrescens ) (Chen et al 1989 ;Krishnan and De 1968 ) and tetraploid × diploid ( V. glabrescens × V. umbellata ) Vigna species. Postfertilization barriers of varying degrees have also been reported in most of the interspecifi c Vigna crosses (Dana 1964 ;Biswas and Dana 1975 ;Machado et al 1982 ;Chen et al 1983 ;Al-Yasiri and Coyne 1966 ;Bharathi et al 2006 ;Pandiyan et al 2010 ;Chaisan et al 2013 ). These affect the successful recovery of desirable recombinants through development of shriveled hybrid seed with reduced or no germination (hybrid inviability), development of dwarf and non-vigorous plants and death of F 1 plants at critical stages of development (hybrid lethality).…”
Section: Crossability Barriersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Barone et al ( 1992 ) observed that the embryos and endosperm in the cross between V. vexillata and V. unguiculata degenerated within 5-8 days after pollination. Using embryo rescue, successful crossing could be accomplished in V. mungo × V. umbellata (Biswas and Dana 1975 ;Chen et al 1983 ). Singh et al ( 2003 ) also produced successful hybrids between V. radiata and V. umbellata , and the hybrids possessed intermediate morphology with MYMV resistance.…”
Section: Embryo Rescuementioning
confidence: 98%
“…[4][5][6]. Buds of optimum size of the female parent were emasculated the day before anthesis (1600 to 1800 HRS) and pollinated in the next morning (0600 to 0800 HRS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevention of fertilization, F, hybrid inviabilobtaining a hybrid, the degree of sterility among ity or sterility, and inviability or weakness among hybrids, or the agronomic worth of backcross, F, or later generations may be influenced by the genotype of individual plants or lines used as parents (Hadley & Openshaw, 1980) . Interspecific hybrids between Cucumis zeyheri and C. sativus (Custers & Den Nijs, 1986), Nicotiana repanda and N. tabacum (Pittarelli & Stavely, 1975), Trifolium nigrescens and T. repens (Hoven, 1962), Vigna radiata and V. umbellata (Chen et al ., 1983) . and Zinnia angustifolia and Z. elegans (Boyle et al ., 1987) have been obtained by identification and utilization of parental lines or clones which significantly improved crossability .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%