Interstate risk sharing in Germany: 1970-2006

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Asdrubali et al. (1996). Their framework allows us to estimate the degree of smoothing of a shock to a state's gross domestic product by factor markets, the government sector, and credit markets, respectively. For the time period from 1970 to 1994 -pre-unification Germany -we find that about 19 percent of shocks to a state's gross domestic product (GDP) are smoothed by private factor markets, 50 percent are smoothed by the German government sector, and a further 17 percent are smoothed through credit markets. For the post-reunification period, 1995 to 2006, the relative importance of the smoothing channels changes. In the complete sample, factor markets contribute around 50.5 percent to consumption smoothing, and credit markets contribute another 17.5 percent. The government sector's role is diminished: it smoothes around 10 percent of a shock. For this period, we also split our sample between West and East German states. In West Germany, 63 percent of idiosyncratic income shocks are smoothed out by factor markets; and another 15 percent by the government sector. In East Germany, factor markets smooth about 34.5 percent of the volatility in state GDP, the government sector about 19 percent, and another 18 percent are smoothed by credit markets. Terms of use: Documents in

The Effectiveness of a Fiscal Transfer Mechanism in a Monetary Union: A DSGE Model for the Euro Area

“…The results show that federal fiscal transfers smooth around 13% of a shock to GDP. Similar studies have been performed for Canada, Germany, the UK and Italy, amongst others by Melitz & Zumer (1999), Antia et al (1999) and Hepp & von Hagen (2013). In the past it has been shown by Sorensen & Yosha (1998), and also recently by Furceri & Zdzienicka (2013), that risk sharing mechanisms are less effective in the Euro area than in other federalist countries such as the US and Germany.…”

The Euro Area Crisis: Need for a Supranational Fiscal Risk Sharing Mechanism?

“…Zumer (1999, 2002) analyze regional data for the U.K. and Italy, and find that the degree of risk sharing provided by capital markets is similar to the U.S., while risk sharing operating through the public sector and credit markets is almost null. For Germany, Hepp and von Hagen (2013) find that in the preunification period 91 % of shocks to per capita state gross product is smoothed by: (i) federal tax-transfer and grant system (54 %); (ii) factor income flows (20 %); and (iii) credit markets (17 %). For the post-unification period, they find that the relative importance of smoothing channels has changed, with factor income flows becoming the most important channel and contributing to about 51 % of total income smoothing.…”

Towards Deeper Financial Integration in Europe: What the Banking Union Can Contribute

“…For Germany, risk sharing through financial markets has become more important over time with 36 % until 1994and 68 % after 1995(Hepp and von Hagen, 2013. While the exact numbers should certainly be taken with caution, they yet show the potential of risk sharing through markets.…”