2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54479-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intertwining Laplace Transformations of Linear Partial Differential Equations

Abstract: We propose a generalization of Laplace transformations to the case of linear partial differential operators (LPDOs) of arbitrary order in R n . Practically all previously proposed differential transformations of LPDOs are particular cases of this transformation (intertwining Laplace transformation, ILT ). We give a complete algorithm of construction of ILT and describe the classes of operators in R n suitable for this transformation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Type I Darboux transformations do, the transformations of Wronskian type of order one fit the framework developed by E.I. Ganzha in [15]. Given L = CM + cB with [M, B] = 0, we initially assume cB = 0, and write L = X 1 X 2 − H by taking X 1 = C, X 2 = M and H = −cB.…”
Section: Classif Ication Of Darboux Transformations Of F Irst Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As Type I Darboux transformations do, the transformations of Wronskian type of order one fit the framework developed by E.I. Ganzha in [15]. Given L = CM + cB with [M, B] = 0, we initially assume cB = 0, and write L = X 1 X 2 − H by taking X 1 = C, X 2 = M and H = −cB.…”
Section: Classif Ication Of Darboux Transformations Of F Irst Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intertwining Laplace transformations depend on writing L in a particular form, where L = X 1 X 2 − H. In our notation, the definition from [15] then gives M = X 2 , ω = −[X 2 , H]H −1 and N = X 2 +ω, where we would like ω to be a differential operator and not merely pseudo-differential. Substituting M = M 1 for X 2 , we have L = A 1 M 1 + M 2 = X 1 X 2 − H. So it would be natural to try setting X 1 = A 1 , giving H = −M 2 .…”
Section: Continued Type I Darboux Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [5,6], a generalization for the case of second order operators in three variables is obtained. The idea of generalization of the Darboux transformations in terms of pseudo differential opera tors was suggested in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%