2011
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2010.2090064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval-Analysis-Based Determination of the Wrench-Feasible Workspace of Parallel Cable-Driven Robots

Abstract: International audienceThis paper deals with the wrench-feasible workspace (WFW) of n-degree-of-freedom parallel robots driven by n or more than n cables. The WFW is the set of mobile platform poses for which the cables can balance any wrench of a given set of wrenches, such that the tension in each cable remains within a prescribed range. Requirements of nonnegative cable tensions, as well as maximum admissible tensions, are thus satisfied. The determination of the WFW is an important issue since its size and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
119
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cables are controlled usually by a positioning system (Borgstrom et al 2008) that actuates in motors for rolling and unrolling cables. These robots are capable of performing many manipulation tasks and they have several conveniences over typical robotic manipulators (German et al 2001): a smaller number of moving parts, a lower level of visual intrusion (Gouttefarde et al 2011), a larger working area and a higher payload ratio relative to the robot's weight. On the other hand, cable interferences, inaccuracies at the end-effector due to cable stretch, and the limited force in the downward directions are some the disadvantages of cable-driven robot (Usher et al 2005).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cables are controlled usually by a positioning system (Borgstrom et al 2008) that actuates in motors for rolling and unrolling cables. These robots are capable of performing many manipulation tasks and they have several conveniences over typical robotic manipulators (German et al 2001): a smaller number of moving parts, a lower level of visual intrusion (Gouttefarde et al 2011), a larger working area and a higher payload ratio relative to the robot's weight. On the other hand, cable interferences, inaccuracies at the end-effector due to cable stretch, and the limited force in the downward directions are some the disadvantages of cable-driven robot (Usher et al 2005).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems led to some approaches (Oh and Agrawal 2006;Gouttefarde et al 2011;German et al 2001) that usually define the controllable workspace of cable-driven robots using a force-feasible methodology. The kinematics model is obtained by the distribution of cable forces (Borgstrom et al 2009): fully-constrained and under-constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cables are controlled usually by a positioning system that actuates in motors for rolling and unrolling cables. These robots are capable of performing many manipulation tasks and they have several conveniences over typical robotic manipulators [5]: a smaller number of moving parts, a lower level of visual intrusion [6], a larger working area and a higher payload ratio relative to the robots weight. On the other hand, cable interferences, inaccuracies at the end-effector due to cable stretch, and the limited force in the downward directions are some the disadvantages of cable-driven robot [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discretization approaches are also proposed in Hay & Snyman (2004;2005). Advanced approaches base on the continuous analysis and verification of the workspace as described in Bruckmann et al (2007a); Gouttefarde et al (2011;. The application of those methods is subject to future work.…”
Section: Workpace Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%