1992
DOI: 10.1037/0033-3204.29.4.580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intervention style and client progress in time-limited group psychotherapy for adults sexually abused as children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stated purpose of the Bonney et al and Wheeler et al studies was to look at the process of group psychotherapy rather than the outcome, but they were included in this review because some outcomes were described. In another group process study, Voigt and Weininger (1992) provided good descriptions of the sample, Tsai and Wagner (1978) Gordy (1983) Herman and Schatzow (1984) Blake-White and Kline (1985) Alexander, Neimeyer, Follette, Moore, and Harter (1989) Roberts andLie (1989) Follette, Alexander, andFollette (1991) C. L. Cole (1985) Bergart (1986) Alexander and Follette (1987) Ganzarain and Buchele (1988) Barney (1990) Kreidler and England (1990) Kreidler and Carlson (1991) Kreidler and Hassan (1992) Kreidler and Fluharty (1994) Carlson and Harrigan (1995) Bonney, Cleveland (1986) Wheeler, O'Malley, Waldo, Murphey, andBlank (1992) Voigt and Weininger (1992) Randall (1995) Alexander et al (1989); Follette et al (1991). b Roberts and Lie (1989).…”
Section: Seminal Studies Seminal Studies Seminal Studies Seminal Studmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stated purpose of the Bonney et al and Wheeler et al studies was to look at the process of group psychotherapy rather than the outcome, but they were included in this review because some outcomes were described. In another group process study, Voigt and Weininger (1992) provided good descriptions of the sample, Tsai and Wagner (1978) Gordy (1983) Herman and Schatzow (1984) Blake-White and Kline (1985) Alexander, Neimeyer, Follette, Moore, and Harter (1989) Roberts andLie (1989) Follette, Alexander, andFollette (1991) C. L. Cole (1985) Bergart (1986) Alexander and Follette (1987) Ganzarain and Buchele (1988) Barney (1990) Kreidler and England (1990) Kreidler and Carlson (1991) Kreidler and Hassan (1992) Kreidler and Fluharty (1994) Carlson and Harrigan (1995) Bonney, Cleveland (1986) Wheeler, O'Malley, Waldo, Murphey, andBlank (1992) Voigt and Weininger (1992) Randall (1995) Alexander et al (1989); Follette et al (1991). b Roberts and Lie (1989).…”
Section: Seminal Studies Seminal Studies Seminal Studies Seminal Studmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lieberman et al, 1973). Of note, several of the current studies reflect efforts to improve earlier classification schemes either by greater elaboration, as in Stinchfield and Burlingame's (1991), efforts to differentiate subtypes of directive interventions made by group therapists, or by reconfiguration, as in Voigt and Weininger's (1992) examination of activating and stabilizing behaviors. These technical refinements in instrumentation, although too few, signify progressive development in a focused field of study.…”
Section: Process Analysis In Therapeutlc Groupsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The dimension that captured the greatest empirical attention in the latest process studies was that of leader behavior. Researchers have examined what the leader says (Flowers & Booraem, 1990a, 1990bKapur, 1993;Kennard, Roberts, & Winter, 1990;Nehls, 1992;Page, Campbell, & Wilder, 1994;Stinchfield & Burlingame, 1991;Voigt & Weininger, 1992), thinks about (Hines, Stockton, & Morran, 1995;Kivlighan & Quigley, 1991), and values (Hamblin, Beutler, Scogin, & Corbishley, 1993). Although methodological sophistication varied widely across these studies, they all seem committed to identifying specific in-group leader behaviors, both overt and covert, that make a difference either in terms of patient responses that immediately follow the therapist intervention (known as small " 0 " ) or ultimate outcome (i.e., big "0').…”
Section: Process Analysis In Therapeutlc Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%