1915
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1915.00070210053004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intestinal Obstruction

Abstract: This experimental study was undertaken for the purpose of explaining certain apparent contradictions in the deductions drawn from experimental work on the development of symptoms and the cause of death in intestinal obstruction. Although a toxin has not been demonstrated in the blood, most observers believe that symptoms and death are the result of a toxemia. The source of the toxin and its physical and chemical properties have not been agreed on, and the manner by which the toxin is taken into the body has no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1916
1916
1932
1932

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting experiment has been performed by Murphy and Brooks (7), who isolated the gall bladder after introducing diluted intestinal contents. The dogs died with symptoms of intoxication, and the contents of their gall bladders were toxic to normal dogs, giving the usual picture of proteose intoxication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An interesting experiment has been performed by Murphy and Brooks (7), who isolated the gall bladder after introducing diluted intestinal contents. The dogs died with symptoms of intoxication, and the contents of their gall bladders were toxic to normal dogs, giving the usual picture of proteose intoxication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albeck (9) believed that it belonged in the group of putrefactive poisons. Murphy and Brooks (7) believe that it may be similar to the substance sepsin isolated by Faust (10). It has been suggested that it might resemble the ~-iminazolyl ethylamine of Dale (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the evidence accumulated from many different studies indicates that the toxic agent is some product of protein degradation, probably several related substances, and that many of the properties and effects of these substances are like those of histamine. Apparently the toxic substance is not absorbed by the normal mucosa (Davis (1914), Murphy andBrooks (1915)) but it has been demonstrated that the mucosa of the bowel above the point of obstruction is not normal, that increased tension within the bowel may cause absorption to take place (Stone and Firor (1924)) and that breaks in the continuity of the mucosa may be produced (Murphy and Brooks (1915), Van Buren (1920)) which allow the toxic substance to enter the tissues.…”
Section: Intestinal Obstruction: Toxemiamentioning
confidence: 99%