2014
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment: A Primer for Social Workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we believe that this study provides a sound evidence base for the use of structured violence risk assessment instruments within community facilities where women attend on a regular basis. Physicians, nurses, social workers, psychologists, and other professionals working across a number of professional settings are likely to encounter individuals experiencing IPV, in part due to its negative physical and mental health consequences (Campbell, 2002a;Messing & Thaller, 2015). Thus, an IPV risk assessment instrument, such as the RVD, could be utilised in safety planning, advocacy and counselling (Campbell, 2002b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we believe that this study provides a sound evidence base for the use of structured violence risk assessment instruments within community facilities where women attend on a regular basis. Physicians, nurses, social workers, psychologists, and other professionals working across a number of professional settings are likely to encounter individuals experiencing IPV, in part due to its negative physical and mental health consequences (Campbell, 2002a;Messing & Thaller, 2015). Thus, an IPV risk assessment instrument, such as the RVD, could be utilised in safety planning, advocacy and counselling (Campbell, 2002b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially relevant in contexts with limited resources, since the most dangerous batterers can receive services first and receive more intensive monitoring (Cattaneo & Goodman, 2005). Furthermore, IPV risk assessment is suitable not only in police, legal, or correctional services where decisions on aggressors and victims are required daily (López-Ossorio, González Álvarez, Buquerín Pascual, García, & Buela-Casal, 2017), but also in the community health context, due to its central role in the process of IPV detection and intervention (Alvarez López, Brito, Arbach, & Andrés-Pueyo, 2010;Colombini, Mayhew, & Watts, 2008;Messing & Thaller, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, while existing actuarial assessments demonstrated validity, such tools were less practical in the context of DV risk assessments related to welfare and the FVO. Most existing risk assessments focused on predicting re-assault, severe violence, or lethal violence committed by perpetrators (e.g., Campbell, Webster, & Glass, 2009;Echeburúa, Fernández-Montalvo, de Corral, & López-Goñi, 2009;Messing & Thaller, 2014). These assessments were most commonly developed for use within the criminal justice system to assess for the likelihood of recidivism.…”
Section: Review Of Risk Assessment Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Det stöd som erbjuds begränsar oftast kvinnans frihet (boende på kvinnojour, larm, skyddat identitet, etc.). Kvinnor kan också behöva hjälp att göra en säkerhetsplanering (Messing & Thaller, 2015).…”
Section: Våldsutsatta Kvinnors Behov Av Stödunclassified