2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IntMA: Dynamic Interaction-aware resource allocation for containerized microservices in cloud environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Auto Scaling System can effectively guide the number of service cases according to the API Gateway stack. When its load exceeds the specified procedure, more instances are created with dynamism to balance the workload [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Auto Scaling System can effectively guide the number of service cases according to the API Gateway stack. When its load exceeds the specified procedure, more instances are created with dynamism to balance the workload [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it was found that the proposed elastic scheduling outperformed all the algorithms with respect to success ratio, auto scaling and better response time. [3] In this particular paper an INTMA algorithm which is Interaction Aware Resource Allocation algorithm was proposed for deploying the microservices. In order to deploy the microservices a new model was proposed which was called as Binary Quadratic Programming Problem.…”
Section: Auto Scaling Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also stressed the need for more research work to optimize deployments at run time, especially through containers' initial deployment and the migration, rebalancing, or auto-scaling of clusters. Hoenisch et al [24] [13] Heuristic (LP-MKP) Virtual machine Network distance, resource fragmentation Multiple clouds [14] Heuristic (Genetic) Virtual machine Cost, Execution time Multiple clouds [15] Heuristic (Genetic) Virtual machine Monetary cost Multiple clouds [19] Heuristic (NSGA-II) Container Cost, Network latency, Reliability Multiple clouds [22] Heuristic (Genetic) Container Security Multiple clouds [24] Heuristic (NSGA-II) Container Cost, Deployment time Multiple clouds [25] Heuristic (LP) Container Cost, Deployment time Single cloud [26] Heuristic (Greedy) Container Energy Single cloud [27] Heuristic (RR+MST) Container Performance Kubernetes cluster [29] Profiling + Heuristic (LP) Virtual machine Tail addressed four-fold auto-scaling by formulating the scaling decision as a multi-object optimization problem. In this work, four dimensions of scaling were considered: VMs and containers can be adjusted horizontally (changes in the number of instances) and vertically (changes in the computational resources available to instances).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piraghaj et al proposed a framework that consolidates containers on virtual machines to improve the energy efficiency of servers [26]. Joseph et al proposed a novel, robust heuristic approach called IntMA to deploy the microservices in an interaction-aware manner with the aid of the interaction information obtained from the interaction graph [27]. This work's remarkable thing is that the target environment was transited from multiple clouds to the Kubernetes cluster.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%