1990
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410200086013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-arterial Floxuridine vs Systemic Fluorouracil for Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
1
8

Year Published

1991
1991
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
112
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining five studies (Kemeny M et al, 1986;Chang et al, 1987; Kemeny N et al, 1987;Hohn et al, 1989;Martin et al, 1990) compared intra-arterial therapy with conventional systemic chemotherapy. Overall, 41% of patients receiving intra-arterial treatment responded compared with only 14% of those receiving systemic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining five studies (Kemeny M et al, 1986;Chang et al, 1987; Kemeny N et al, 1987;Hohn et al, 1989;Martin et al, 1990) compared intra-arterial therapy with conventional systemic chemotherapy. Overall, 41% of patients receiving intra-arterial treatment responded compared with only 14% of those receiving systemic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that intrahepatic chemotherapy is an effective therapy and is associated with a significantly higher number of responses than systemic chemotherapy. [42][43][44][45][46][47] The response rates for HAI were 48 to 62 percent, compared with zero to 21 percent for intravenous therapy. Critics have pointed out that this increase in response rate has translated to increased survival in only one study.…”
Section: Regional Infusional Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These abnormalities might have been produced by release of inflammatory mediators from liver parenchyma (Jenkins and Williams, 1980) or liver metastases (Ueda et al, 1994). Hepatic parenchymal volume is not reduced by colorectal liver metastases (Dworkin et al, 1 995a), and it is also possible that catheterization-induced hepatic arterial thrombosis resulted in parenchymal necrosis where portal venous flow was impeded by metastases (Martin et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%