2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-arterial induction high-dose chemotherapy with cisplatin for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: long-term results

Abstract: Intra-arterial (IA) chemotherapy for curative treatment of head and neck cancer experienced a revival in the last decade. Mainly, it was used in concurrent combination with radiation in organ-preserving settings. The modern method of transfemoral approach for catheterisation, superselective perfusion of the tumour-feeding vessel, and high-dose (150 mg m À2 ) administration of cisplatin with parallel systemic neutralisation with sodium thiosulphate (9 g m À2 ) made preoperative usage feasible. The present paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our present data confirmed the evidence that regional chemotherapy by superselective transfemoral infusion of high doses of platinum compounds is feasible and that, with the cooperation of an experienced interventional radiologist, can be easily reproduced in a multi-institutional setting, with minimal procedural complications [9,11,14-16]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our present data confirmed the evidence that regional chemotherapy by superselective transfemoral infusion of high doses of platinum compounds is feasible and that, with the cooperation of an experienced interventional radiologist, can be easily reproduced in a multi-institutional setting, with minimal procedural complications [9,11,14-16]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A true neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy approach for head and neck cancer treatment is rare and the results of many trials are difficult to compare, owing to a number of methodological differences [16]. Limiting our comparison to the latest studies conducted with platinum compounds, our response rates at the end of induction chemotherapy (CR 35% and PR 43%) are similar to those observed by Kovacs [16] (CR 38% and PR 31%) and lower than those observed by Wilson et al [25] (CR 68% and PR 23%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, surgery is the standard treatment (Poulsen et al, 1996). Several studies have reported arterial injection therapy for oral cavity cancer; however, the number of patients in such studies tended to be small, and its usefulness has not yet been clearly (Hirai et al, 1999;Damascelli et al, 2003;Kovacs, 2004). No randomised controlled trials have yet been performed to compare the effectiveness of surgery with chemoradiation, and the usefulness of chemoradiation therapy involving systemic chemotherapy thus remains to be clarified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] Perfusion was strictly selective to the primary, and no lymph nodes were perfused additionally. Three to four weeks later, remission of the primary was graded as: CR = complete remission, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%