2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Articular Morphine for Inflammatory Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, intra-articular morphine in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) effectively relieves pain in temporomandibular disorder patients (Ziegler et al, 2010), but render ineffective in patients following TMJ arthroscopy (Bryant et al, 1999). While the discrepant findings seem to undermine the clinical importance of targeting peripheral opioid receptors methodological factors such as study sensitivity, tissue inflammation, or superimposition of general or local anesthetics, which can mask the local opioid effects need to be carefully considered (Stein, 2006; Stein and Küchler, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, intra-articular morphine in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) effectively relieves pain in temporomandibular disorder patients (Ziegler et al, 2010), but render ineffective in patients following TMJ arthroscopy (Bryant et al, 1999). While the discrepant findings seem to undermine the clinical importance of targeting peripheral opioid receptors methodological factors such as study sensitivity, tissue inflammation, or superimposition of general or local anesthetics, which can mask the local opioid effects need to be carefully considered (Stein, 2006; Stein and Küchler, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the majority agree on the analgesic efficacy of intra-articular morphine (Gupta et al, 2001;Kalso et al, 2002;Sawynok, 2003), some do not (Rosseland, 2005). Most commonly, negative results have been attributed to lack of study sensitivity (i.e., patients did not have sufficiently high baseline pain scores to detect a significant reduction), lack of tissue inflammation, or the superimposition of general or local anesthetic effects (Kalso et al, 2002;Rosseland, 2005;Stein, 2006). In addition, controversial conclusions from reviews can result from biased selection of studies (Stein, 2006).…”
Section: A Treatment Of Pain and Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-articular (IA) administration of morphine for pain relief after arthroscopic procedures is used widely as part of multimodal analgesic protocols in humans. A substantial part of the 70 or more controlled trials that have investigated the analgesic effects of IA morphine (Stein 2006) have been included in several major reviews and meta-analyses (Kalso et al 1997(Kalso et al , 2002Gupta et al 2001;Rosseland 2005). Although the majority of studies concluded that IA morphine possesses a significant analgesic effect, lasting up to 24 hours (Kalso et al 1997(Kalso et al , 2002Gupta et al 2001) there is still some debate whether the analgesia is of clinical relevance in humans (Solheim et al 2006;Stein 2006;Rosseland et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%