“…It has been argued that this is the reason why in bones that are habitually torsionally loaded the relationships of CFO and other histomorphological characteristics are less clear with respect to load history even when unidirectional bending coexists (Rubin et al, 2013;Skedros, 2012). In this context, it is notable that "highcomplexity" best characterizes the load histories of the regions of limb bones that are typically evaluated in anthropological studies of cortical bone histomorphology (Burr et al, 1990;Carando et al, 1989;Cooper et al, 2007;Demes et al, 2001;Feik et al 1996;Havill, 2004;Havill et al, 2013;Hillier and Bell, 2007;Martiniakov a et al, 2006;Miszkiewicz, 2016;Mulhern and Van Gerven, 1997;Paine and Godfrey, 1997;Pfeiffer et al, 2006;Portigliatti et al, 1984;Schaffler and Burr, 1984;Sinclair et al, 2013;Skedros et al, 2015;Urbanov a and Novotn y, 2005;Warshaw, 2008). This is an important consideration; attempts at correlating load history with regional variations in histomorphological characteristics (i.e., between regions of the same cross-section) may be unsuccessful if it is anticipated that unidirectional bending is sufficient for evoking regional differences in matrix adaptations when the habitual loading is actually much more complex (i.e., shear strains are prevalent and diffusely distributed; Figure 1; Goldman et al, 2003;Havill et al, 2013;Mayya et al, 2013;Skedros, 2012;Skedros et al, 2015).…”