2014
DOI: 10.4168/aair.2014.6.5.458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intradermal Tests for Diagnosis of Drug Allergy are not Affected by a Topical Anesthetic Patch

Abstract: The use of topical anesthesia to perform intradermal tests (IDTs) for drug allergy diagnosis was never investigated. We aimed to determine the effects of a topical anesthetic patch containing prilocaine-lidocaine on wheal size of IDT with drugs. Patients who had positive IDT as part of their investigation process of suspected drug hypersensitivity were selected. IDT were performed according to guidelines. Anesthetic patch (AP) was placed and the same prior positive IDT, as well as positive histamine skin prick… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Validation of ST with EMLA® with other drugs found no differences in ST results but platins were not evaluated in this study. 12 Although none of the suspected HSR was confirmed by ST, the high rate of BR during RDD (60%) corroborates the initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Validation of ST with EMLA® with other drugs found no differences in ST results but platins were not evaluated in this study. 12 Although none of the suspected HSR was confirmed by ST, the high rate of BR during RDD (60%) corroborates the initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…11 Validation of ST with EMLA® with other drugs found no differences in ST results but platins were not evaluated in this study. 12 F I G U R E 1 For understanding purpose, an adapted protocol was adjusted according to 2 hypothetical scenarios, based on our patients Although none of the suspected HSR was confirmed by ST, the high rate of BR during RDD (60%) corroborates the initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 In young children, skin tests can be very challenging to perform, although the application of an anesthetic ointment including lidocaine and prilocaine has shown to effectively reduce discomfort associated with intradermal tests, without interfering with its results. 34 Moreover, children undergoing chemotherapy are frequently receiving treatment protocols that include steroids and other drugs that can compromise skin test results. 33 The decision to desensitize after a risk/benefit evaluation should be taken by an experienced allergist in this field, together with the specialist treating the children.…”
Section: Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin tests to diagnose immediate reactions can be done but are only validated for some drugs, like beta‐lactams and platinum salts 33 . In young children, skin tests can be very challenging to perform, although the application of an anesthetic ointment including lidocaine and prilocaine has shown to effectively reduce discomfort associated with intradermal tests, without interfering with its results 34 . Moreover, children undergoing chemotherapy are frequently receiving treatment protocols that include steroids and other drugs that can compromise skin test results 33…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An EMLA (eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine) cream or patch used before intradermal and prick testing in people significantly reduces pain without influencing wheal size. 9,10 EMLA cream also has been shown to significantly reduce pain in rabbits undergoing ear tattooing, as well as in laboratory dogs, cats and rabbits undergoing venipuncture. 11,12 Topical local anaesthetic application is safe and well-tolerated in people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%