2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00103-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data – a data set for the validation of models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

44
296
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
44
296
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Axial rotation (torsion) was simulated by applying a pure torsional moment with a superimposed follower load of 460 N. Thus, the axial load was the same as for the other loading cases. The calculated intradiscal pressures in L4/ 5 for the intact lumbar spine were close to those measured in vivo for all four loading cases studied [8,15,17].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Axial rotation (torsion) was simulated by applying a pure torsional moment with a superimposed follower load of 460 N. Thus, the axial load was the same as for the other loading cases. The calculated intradiscal pressures in L4/ 5 for the intact lumbar spine were close to those measured in vivo for all four loading cases studied [8,15,17].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…NZ/wPTs in the compression groups were lower than that in the sham group, while NZ/woPTs in compression groups were greater than that in the sham group studies using the tail model [25], which reported that disc degenerations were induced under continuous compressive stresses of 1 MPa applied for 7-14 days. This magnitude of stress was observed in human lumbar discs in daily activity [32,37,43,44]. Hence, the compressive stress of 0.5 and 1.0 MPa in our experiment was within the physiological level, although the loading period was longer than the physiological one [30].…”
Section: Rationale Of the Experimentssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…These study findings may be important since a review on risk factors related to back pain at young age indicated that sitting is the most common factor associated with back pain reports in youngsters [1]. Furthermore, at adolescent age youngsters typically adopt stooping postures, which may result in pressure on the anterior aspects of the vertebral growth plates [32]. In addition, the present findings at 2-year followup on lifting aspects, which suggest the implementation of principles in relation to a biomechanical favorable lifestyle, are positive owing to the impact of lifting activities that may increase in youngster's daily life at secondary school age (such as in vocational education).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the second place, at 13-14 years of age the transition from childhood to adolescence takes place, which is characterized by a biological impact (maturation) and psychosocial implications (psychological development, switch in educational system, exposure to plenty of new interests and influences throughout the peer group). During this transition period, stooping postures are frequently adopted for whatever reason (feelings of shame for the changing body or imitations in conscious of being ''cool''), which may result in pressure on the anterior aspects of the vertebral growth plates [32]. As a final aspect, the mounting back pain reporting around the growth spurt [1] justifies research on the stability of early intervention effects in youngsters at secondary school age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%