2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2014.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: interobserver reproducibility survey of 39 urologic pathologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They therefore represent robust morphological biomarkers of aggressive prostate cancer, with few false positive diagnoses. This is in keeping with the few interobserver studies focused on IDC and CC in prostatectomy‐derived samples, showing that pathologists attained good agreement for the diagnosis of both IDC and CC . Indeed, among the various architectural patterns constituting Gleason grade 4, including ill‐formed, fused and glomeruloid pattern, CC scored highest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…They therefore represent robust morphological biomarkers of aggressive prostate cancer, with few false positive diagnoses. This is in keeping with the few interobserver studies focused on IDC and CC in prostatectomy‐derived samples, showing that pathologists attained good agreement for the diagnosis of both IDC and CC . Indeed, among the various architectural patterns constituting Gleason grade 4, including ill‐formed, fused and glomeruloid pattern, CC scored highest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Iczkowski et al demonstrated significant interobserver variation with only 43% agreement in the diagnosis of IDC-P 11. In that study, the lead authors circulated photomicrographs to 39 uropathologists and interpreted from their responses which criteria had been used to render a diagnosis of IDC-P.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study using photomicrographs found significant variation in the diagnosis of IDC-P among expert uropathologists 11. However, it is unclear whether this was due to the inevitable variation in interpreting borderline cases, use of different diagnostic criteria or a combination of both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies are required to further validate the clinical utility and functional relevance of DNA methylation events in cribriform and IDC architecture, and whether it should be routinely included in the RP pathology reports. Due to the challenges in the unequivocal identification of these clinicopathological entities by certain pathologists, the evaluation of these morphological features must be incorporated in the rapidly developing field of digitized histopathology (18,19,34). This may provide clinically translatable imaging markers for PCa prognosis.…”
Section: Median Pmr Values ------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unequivocal identification of these pathological features based on the morphological criteria alone has been reported as challenging (18,19). In this regard, molecular features such as DNA methylation alterations may be of value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%