2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intralocus sexual conflict

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

20
872
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 706 publications
(895 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
20
872
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This last insight is of particular importance in light of recent findings identifying intralocus sexual conflict (IaSC) as a major genetic constraint on adaptation in sexual populations (Bonduriansky and Chenoweth 2009;Cox and Calsbeek 2009). IaSC occurs when selection favors alternative alleles in males and females at a given locus (Rice 1992;Chippindale et al 2001) and can act to maintain standing genetic variation with sexually antagonistic (SA) effects on fitness (Kidwell 1977;Connallon and Clark 2012;Arnqvist et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This last insight is of particular importance in light of recent findings identifying intralocus sexual conflict (IaSC) as a major genetic constraint on adaptation in sexual populations (Bonduriansky and Chenoweth 2009;Cox and Calsbeek 2009). IaSC occurs when selection favors alternative alleles in males and females at a given locus (Rice 1992;Chippindale et al 2001) and can act to maintain standing genetic variation with sexually antagonistic (SA) effects on fitness (Kidwell 1977;Connallon and Clark 2012;Arnqvist et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theory predicts that IaSC and IeSC are intricately linked (Arnqvist and Rowe 2005;Bonduriansky and Chenoweth 2009;Perry and Rowe 2014). IaSC could, for example, arise whenever IeSC over optimal mating rates spurs coevolution of interacting male and female reproductive traits that, to some extent, share a common genetic basis in the sexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under such conditions, alleles at a particular locus may confer opposite fitness consequences when expressed in either sex Bedhomme and Chippindale, 2007;Bonduriansky and Chenoweth, 2009), generating intralocus sexual conflict in which the adaptive evolution of one sex is impeded or limited by the other (Lande, 1980;Rice, 1984). Recent reviews suggest that sexually antagonistic selection may be common in natural populations (Cox and Calsbeek, 2009) and that the intersex genetic covariance for phenotypic traits is generally positive (Poissant et al, 2009), indicating considerable potential for ongoing intralocus conflict.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lande (1980) showed how, in dioecious populations where males and females have separate optima, intersex genetic correlations can slow the rate at which mean fitness (i.e., male and female, jointly) increases. Although adaptation is initially rapid due to alleles with sexually concordant effects, as these alleles become fixed the response slows and the remaining genetic variance is characterized by negative intersex correlations (Chapman et al, 2003;Bonduriansky and Chenoweth, 2009). By extension, the r w FM observed in novel environments might also be expected to vary with the absolute fitness of the population in each, whereby relatively harsh environments tend to reveal sexually concordant genetic variation, whereas in relatively benign ones sex-specific (and potentially sexually discordant) genetic variance figures more prominently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from enabling work on species that may not be amenable to controlled experiments, the study of wild populations is motivated by unparalleled opportunities to address topics requiring fitness estimates that are minimally influenced by experimental conditions (Ellegren and Sheldon, 2008;Clutton-Brock and Sheldon, 2010;Slate et al, 2010). These include the genetic architecture of fitness in natural environments (Ellegren and Sheldon, 2008), the evolutionary dynamics of sexually selected traits (Chenoweth and McGuigan, 2010), evolutionary stasis (for example, Gratten et al, 2008) and sexually antagonistic genetic variation (Bonduriansky and Chenoweth, 2009;Slate et al, 2010). However, apart from work in humans, studies on the genetic architecture of ecologically important traits in free-living populations remain rare because of difficulties in maintaining multigenerational pedigrees and assembling adequate genotype-phenotype data sets (Slate, 2005;Slate et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%