2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2014.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramuscular midazolam versus intravenous diazepam for treatment of seizures in the pediatric emergency department: A randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intramuscular midazolam was compared with IV diazepam in three class III studies (36, 43, 55). In all three studies, IM midazolam had a shorter interval to seizure cessation, but there was no significant difference in overall efficacy for termination of seizures (36, 43, 55).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Intramuscular midazolam was compared with IV diazepam in three class III studies (36, 43, 55). In all three studies, IM midazolam had a shorter interval to seizure cessation, but there was no significant difference in overall efficacy for termination of seizures (36, 43, 55).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the class III IM or intranasal midazolam studies reported significant respiratory depression (36–39, 43, 45, 46, 53). Single children in each study (6.25% and 2%) in the IM midazolam group experienced respiratory failure resulting in artificial ventilation (51, 55).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Paraldehyde is delivered intramuscularly (IM) or rectally and may have fewer respiratory suppressive effects relative to diazepam, but is not widely available, and though an older agent, is prohibitively expensive in many settings. IM midazolam has shown a shorter interval of seizure termination when compared to IV diazepam in three paediatric randomized controlled trials (RCT’s), but there was no significant difference in overall efficacy for termination of seizures [22] , [23] , [24] . Midazolam can be administered via IV, IM, intranasal or buccal routes with good effect for seizure cessation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that some patients in these studies received commercially available buccal midazolam (Epistatus ® ) while others received injectable midazolam buccally, which may have impacted the results. Buccal diazepam has less variability in achieving maximum concentrations compared to rectal diazepam, but the time to reach maximum concentrations is longer [69,80]. One important factor to consider is that food, saliva secretion, and local pH may alter the absorption of the buccal films and it may reduce their maximum concentration [60].…”
Section: Evidence For Routes Of Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%