1987
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/156.2.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intranasally Administered Interferon as Prophylaxis Against Experimentally Induced Influenza A Virus Infection in Humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Replication of human influenza A virus in monocytes promotes viral spreading through a host body. IFNs were used for prophylaxis against experimentally induced influenza A virus infection in humans and mice (30,31). It was our working hypothesis, based on recently published data (8), that application of PAR 2 agonist could also play a role in the suppression of influenza A virus replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replication of human influenza A virus in monocytes promotes viral spreading through a host body. IFNs were used for prophylaxis against experimentally induced influenza A virus infection in humans and mice (30,31). It was our working hypothesis, based on recently published data (8), that application of PAR 2 agonist could also play a role in the suppression of influenza A virus replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter group, we obtained infectivity risk based on research data where viral shedding was measured in volunteers challenged with wild-type influenza viruses4142434445464748. We mapped the viral shedding to infectivity8 and rescaled the infectivity curve according to the length of infectivity period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, other studies of higher doses of IFN (1000~10,000 times more per day) showed no efficacy against influenza viruses (Hayden et al, 1983; Merigan et al, 1973; Phillpotts et al, 1984; Saito et al, 1985; Treanor et al, 1987), suggesting that the dose of IFN is an important consideration in assessing antiviral effectiveness. In animals, recent studies showed that IFN orally or intranasally delivered to mice (Beilharz et al, 2007; Grimm et al, 2007; Tumpey et al, 2007), guinea pig (Van Hoeven et al, 2009) or ferrets (Kugel et al, 2009) reduced influenza virus replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%