1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01658461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative autotransfusion

Abstract: Intraoperative autotransfusion was done only sporadically until equipment, modified from cardiac surgery, became available in the 1970's. Use has increased because of the availability of cell‐washing techniques and the increased demand for blood associated with complex operations, such as liver transplantation and resection of thoracoabdominal aneurysms. There is a lack of agreement about the use of anticoagulation with autotransfusion, and there are several factors that limit widespread applicability. More st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a theoretical risk of coagulopathy exists, it has not been born out in practice [2]. The systemic hematologic changes that accompany the autotransfusion of fresh intraperitoneal blood usually revert to normal by the first or second postoperative day [9]. Nevertheless, complications due to extracellular hemoglobin occur when stale hemolyzed blood is re‐infused [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a theoretical risk of coagulopathy exists, it has not been born out in practice [2]. The systemic hematologic changes that accompany the autotransfusion of fresh intraperitoneal blood usually revert to normal by the first or second postoperative day [9]. Nevertheless, complications due to extracellular hemoglobin occur when stale hemolyzed blood is re‐infused [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential adverse effects of lOBS include sepsis and spread of malignancy. Besides clinical experience several studies support the feasibility of lOBS with patients with contaminated wounds (21)(22)(23) when washing techniques are used and antibiotics added to washing solutions. Nonetheless the risk of sepsis is real since, as shown by Bourdeux (22) cell washing only partially removes blood contamination.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…172 Blood salvaged from a serosal cavity has little residual fibrinogen and few platelets, and clotting is usually not a problem; therefore, the addition of anticoagulants to the collection is usually not necessary. 173 Despite the substantial levels of free hemoglobin in the salvaged blood, RBCs survive normally, as documented by studies involving radiolabeled markers. 174 In addition to free hemoglobin, the salvaged blood may be contaminated with tissue exudate, bone, bone marrow, and other biologic and surgical materials; nevertheless, most patients tolerate the infusions well.…”
Section: Postoperative Autologous Transfusion: Blood Salvagementioning
confidence: 99%