2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00706-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation and delayed neurocognitive recovery after major oncologic surgery: a secondary analysis of pooled data

Abstract: Cerebral blood flow is tightly regulated by cerebrovascular autoregulation (CVA), and intraoperative impairment of CVA has been linked with perioperative neurocognitive disorders. We aim to assess whether impairment of CVA during major oncologic surgery is associated with delayed neurocognitive recovery (DNCR) postoperatively. We performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data. Patients were included if they had undergone complete pre- and postoperative neuropsychological assessments, continuous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several previous studies have demonstrated excellent specificity and sensitivity between the ONSD and ICP, so intraoperative ICP changes can be evaluated by monitoring the ONSD ( 19 , 20 ). The cut-off value of the ONSD corresponding to intracranial hypertension (ICP > 20 mmHg) in previous studies was 5 mm ( 21 , 22 ). Our research showed that regardless of whether or not the IJV catheterization was performed, the ONSD reached more than 5 mm before returning to the supine position at the end of surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several previous studies have demonstrated excellent specificity and sensitivity between the ONSD and ICP, so intraoperative ICP changes can be evaluated by monitoring the ONSD ( 19 , 20 ). The cut-off value of the ONSD corresponding to intracranial hypertension (ICP > 20 mmHg) in previous studies was 5 mm ( 21 , 22 ). Our research showed that regardless of whether or not the IJV catheterization was performed, the ONSD reached more than 5 mm before returning to the supine position at the end of surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We also did not find any reduction in health status, such as reduced rate of early postoperative cognitive recovery, as previously described with lorazepam premedication . Notably, delayed neurocognitive recovery was previously reported after midazolam premedication . One reason why the I-PROMOTE trial was not able to detect differences in neurocognitive recovery might be the applied low dose of midazolam, 3.75 mg. A further reason might be that only legally competent patients without neuropsychiatric disorders were eligible, and thus patients with enhanced risk were missed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 Notably, delayed neurocognitive recovery was previously reported after midazolam premedication. 33 , 34 One reason why the I-PROMOTE trial was not able to detect differences in neurocognitive recovery might be the applied low dose of midazolam, 3.75 mg. A further reason might be that only legally competent patients without neuropsychiatric disorders were eligible, and thus patients with enhanced risk were missed. We acknowledge that there may be valid reasons that justify midazolam premedication, like improved psychological recovery along with reduced postoperative infections 23 or prevention of explicit recall of perioperative events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline cognitive function was assessed on the day of hospital admission and postoperative cognitive function was evaluated between day three post-procedure and before hospital discharge. Each assessment included a battery of four neuropsychological tests, as reported in detail previously (Beck et al, 2020;Kahl et al, 2022). Briefly, we used the German version of the California Verbal Learning Test to evaluate verbal learning and memory (Testzentrale, Göttingen, Germany) (Niemann et al, 2008), the Trail Making Test A and B to evaluate executive function (Reitan, 1958;Rodewald et al, 2012), the Grooved Pegboard Test to assess visuomotor skills (Liu et al, 2021) (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, IN), and the Digit Span Forward task to assess attention for the pre-and postoperative assessment of multiple domains of cognitive function.…”
Section: Cognitive Reserve and Psychometric Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%