2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01536.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrapartum amnioinfusion for meconium‐stained amniotic fluid: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current consensus is that in clinical settings with standard perinatal surveillance, evidence does not support the use of amnioinfusion for MSAF. However, when there is limited perinatal surveillance, where complications of MSAF are common, it appears to reduce the incidence of MAS [11,12].…”
Section: Obstetrical Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current consensus is that in clinical settings with standard perinatal surveillance, evidence does not support the use of amnioinfusion for MSAF. However, when there is limited perinatal surveillance, where complications of MSAF are common, it appears to reduce the incidence of MAS [11,12].…”
Section: Obstetrical Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sir, First, we would like to thank Jana et al for their valuable comments on our paper Intrapartum amnioinfusion for meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. 1,2 We agree that electronic fetal monitoring may not be the only essential component of standard care. We believe that fetal scalp blood sampling can be a useful adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1,2 We agree that electronic fetal monitoring may not be the only essential component of standard care. We believe that fetal scalp blood sampling can be a useful adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation