2008
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Abstract: Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Assess the rationale behind using i.p. chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer patients and critically evauate the data supporting its use. Interpret the argument that i.p. chemotherapy cannot be accepted as standard of care for first‐line systemic treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma. Determine which epithelial ovarian cancer patients may be appropriate for i.p. chemotherapy. Avoid and/or manage the toxicities observed with i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, bidirectional chemotherapy combining synchronous intraoperative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin and systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil has been introduced, targeting both the peritoneal cavity and subperitoneal blood vessels, and has shown long-term survival in patients with colorectal cancer and appendix adenocarcinoma. Oncologists acknowledge that disease control may be significantly improved when chemotherapy is administered through the intraperitoneal route [3]. This is supported by extensive clinical and pharmacological research studies and unprecedented therapeutic results have been reported [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, bidirectional chemotherapy combining synchronous intraoperative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin and systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil has been introduced, targeting both the peritoneal cavity and subperitoneal blood vessels, and has shown long-term survival in patients with colorectal cancer and appendix adenocarcinoma. Oncologists acknowledge that disease control may be significantly improved when chemotherapy is administered through the intraperitoneal route [3]. This is supported by extensive clinical and pharmacological research studies and unprecedented therapeutic results have been reported [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the improved median overall survival with this regimen (up to 50 months), recurrence occurs in 75% of patients and 20-30% of these patients might have resistance to the platinum analogues (49). A survival benefit in patients treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy as compared to systemic chemotherapy alone was also reported in a phase III trial (50). Intraperitoneal chemotherapy one dose prior to surgery yielded better survival rates than those who had only adjuvant systemic intravenous chemotherapy (51).…”
Section: Ovarian Cancermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, even treatments that have demonstrated a robust improvement in OS may sometimes struggle for full implementation in practice. For example, intravenously administered chemotherapy continues to be the most commonly used standard of care following cytoreduction surgery for advanced ovarian cancer, even though combined intraperitoneal -intravenous administration has been shown to provide a clear survival improvement: a pooled analysis of seven randomized trials demonstrated a 9-month OS improvement for intraperitoneal -intravenous versus intravenous administration alone [64]. However, intraperitoneal regimens are more toxic, more difficult to administer and require additional supportive care [65].…”
Section: ■ Os Interpretation In the Context Of The Treatment's Toxicimentioning
confidence: 99%