1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02372422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific host discrimination and larval competition inMicroplitis croceipes, Microplitis demolitor, Cotesia kazak (Hym.: Braconidae) andHyposoter didymator (Hym.: Ichneumonidae), parasitoids ofHeliothis virescens (Lep.: Noctuidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in the laboratory, C. sonorensis readily attacks and develops in another sympatric Nearctic noctuid, C. (Pseudoplusia) includens, whereas this association has not been reported from the field (Harvey & Strand, 2002). The ecology of H. didymator is poorly known, which is surprising, considered that this parasitoid has, in addition to its physiology, been widely studied for the purposes of classical biological control (Mironidis & Savopoulou-Soultani, 2009;Tillman & Powell, 1992). In Europe, its primary hosts are C. chalcites and L. oleracea, all of which are strongly sympatric (Reudler-Talsma et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in the laboratory, C. sonorensis readily attacks and develops in another sympatric Nearctic noctuid, C. (Pseudoplusia) includens, whereas this association has not been reported from the field (Harvey & Strand, 2002). The ecology of H. didymator is poorly known, which is surprising, considered that this parasitoid has, in addition to its physiology, been widely studied for the purposes of classical biological control (Mironidis & Savopoulou-Soultani, 2009;Tillman & Powell, 1992). In Europe, its primary hosts are C. chalcites and L. oleracea, all of which are strongly sympatric (Reudler-Talsma et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situations of superparasitism, the age and developmental stage of the first immature parasitoid present on or in a host influence the fitness of the second parasitizing female (Mackauer, 1990;Tillman & Powell, 1992;Marris & Casperd, 1996;Ueno, 1999;Islam & Copland, 2000), especially in solitary species. This should favor evolution of the ability to assess the age of the competitor on a parasitized host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situations where superparasitism is adaptive, the ability to choose from parasitized hosts those that offer the best survival probability to the progeny could be an advantageous trait. This probability frequently depends on the age (i.e., the developmental stage) of the first parasitoid present in or on the host (Mackauer, 1990;Tillman & Powell, 1992;Ueno, 1999;Islam & Copland, 2000). Thus, the ability to use cues that are correlated with the time elapsed since the first parasitism could provide parasitoids with a strong selective advantage by allowing them to select their hosts more efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of competition for control of the host may become intense in situations where suitable hosts are scarce or numbers of parasitoids are high (Schoener, ). In most cases, this “tug‐of‐war” for host possession leads to the exclusion of one of the species involved (Tillman and Powell, ; Tamo et al., ; Yamamoto et al., ; Harvey et al., ; Cusumano et al., ). However, a few studies have reported that two different species share the resources in a single individual host and both survive to adult eclosion (Marktl et al., ; Sallam et al., ; Magdaraog et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%