2006
DOI: 10.1080/00222930600639249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific morphological tooth variability and geographical distribution: Application to the Savi's vole,Microtus (Terricola) savii(Rodentia, Arvicolinae)

Abstract: The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At an intraspecific level, north‐central and southern populations may be discriminated by the morphology of the first lower molar. Interestingly, the same pattern is also known at an interspecific level within the subgenus Microtus ( Terricola ) between northern and southern species in western Europe …”
Section: Savi's Pine Volesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…At an intraspecific level, north‐central and southern populations may be discriminated by the morphology of the first lower molar. Interestingly, the same pattern is also known at an interspecific level within the subgenus Microtus ( Terricola ) between northern and southern species in western Europe …”
Section: Savi's Pine Volesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Indeed, not just molar proportions but also tooth pattern began to be highly specialized (prismatic pattern and increasing highcrown molars) as food became very abrasive. In comparison with the pattern found in other groups of rodents during quaternary time (i.e., bunodont form), the prismatic pattern of vole molars could provide a better adaptation to the abrasive vegetation found in steppes and meadows in which voles and lemmings usually live (Nadachowski 1984;Marchand et al 2003;Montuire and Brunet-Lecomte 2004;Nappi et al 2006). Nevertheless, essentially three features can be distinguished on the structure of tooth row: (1) molar proportions, (2) occlusal tooth design and enamel structure (e.g., bunodont, lophodont, prismatic: see von Koenisgwald 1980Koenisgwald , 1982Janis 1995Janis , 2000Evans et al 2005Evans et al , 2007Lucas et al 2008), and (3) crown growth (hypsodonty versus brachyodonty; see Jernvall et al 2000b;Jernvall and Fortelius 2002;Fortelius et al 2003;MacFadden 2005).…”
Section: Arvicolinae Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, not just molar proportions but also tooth pattern began to be highly specialized (prismatic pattern and increasing high‐crown molars) as food became very abrasive. In comparison with the pattern found in other groups of rodents during quaternary time (i.e ., bunodont form), the prismatic pattern of vole molars could provide a better adaptation to the abrasive vegetation found in steppes and meadows in which voles and lemmings usually live (Nadachowski 1984; Marchand et al 2003; Montuire and Brunet‐Lecomte 2004; Nappi et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, in a fossil series of the arvicoline Terricola savii, the length-to-width ratio increased over time [23] and also varies among contemporary populations [55] indicating a length-width evolutionary allometry deviating from isometry (i.e. b = 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%