1994
DOI: 10.1016/0098-8472(94)90026-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific responses of 188 rice cultivars to enhanced UVB radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant positive correlation between leaf N mass and % changes of GS activities (r = 0.928, n = 6, p<0.01) was observed. A similar conclusion was drawn by Dai et al (1994) and Niu et al (2007). The increase in activities of glutamine synthetase could improve N metabolism and amino acid assimilation.…”
Section: Uv-b Radiation and N Metabolismssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A significant positive correlation between leaf N mass and % changes of GS activities (r = 0.928, n = 6, p<0.01) was observed. A similar conclusion was drawn by Dai et al (1994) and Niu et al (2007). The increase in activities of glutamine synthetase could improve N metabolism and amino acid assimilation.…”
Section: Uv-b Radiation and N Metabolismssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It is sensitive to UV-B radiation. Previous studies showed that UV-B irradiation treatment led to a significant reduction in the plant height of rice, the content of total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and soluble protein; and the activity of Rubisco (EC 4.1.1.39) and antioxidant enzymes in the leaves of rice (Dai et al 1994;Hidema et al 1996;Lin et al 1999;Jain et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These increased UV-B levels are expected to peak about the turn of the century and gradually recover over the following 50 yr (Madronich et al 1995). While there is ample documentation that enhanced UV-B can lead to less total biomass production in some species (Tevini & Teramura 1989;Caldwell et al 1995), enhanced UV-B fails to reduce biomass in other species (Barnes et al 1988;Tevini & Teramura 1989;Sinclair et al 1990), and even stimulates biomass production in some cases Teramura et al 1991;Sullivan et al 1992;Ziska et al 1992;Dai et al 1994;Musil & Wand 1994). Patterns of biomass allocation between aboveground and belowground structures (Teramura et al 1991;Ziska et al 1993; Barnes et al 1993), as well as among different aboveground parts (Teramura et al 1991; Barnes et al 1988Barnes et al , 1990Barnes et al , 1993, can be shifted following exposure to enhanced UV-B, although these shifts are quite variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterns of biomass allocation between aboveground and belowground structures (Teramura et al 1991;Ziska et al 1993; Barnes et al 1993), as well as among different aboveground parts (Teramura et al 1991; Barnes et al 1988Barnes et al , 1990Barnes et al , 1993, can be shifted following exposure to enhanced UV-B, although these shifts are quite variable. For example, in three separate studies comparing several rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars (Teramura et al 1991; Barnes et al 1993; Dai et al 1994), researchers found that enhanced UV-B caused some culitvars to produce less biomass, while other cultivars produced more biomass. These researchers also found shifts in biomass partitioning, and that the direction of these shifts varied among cultivars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%