1992
DOI: 10.1089/jop.1992.8.343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravitreal Ganciclovir Pharmacokinetics in Rabbits and Man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical trials reported good response rates to intravitreal induction therapy with GCV (Cochereau-Massin et al, 1991). However, very few studies have been carried out to date delineating the intravitreal pharmacokinetics of GCV (Henry et al, 1987;Ashton et al, 1992;Morlet et al, 1996). The major constraint to the development and assessment of posterior segment pharmacokinetics of drugs in animal models is the inaccessibility of the ocular fluids for continuous serial sampling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials reported good response rates to intravitreal induction therapy with GCV (Cochereau-Massin et al, 1991). However, very few studies have been carried out to date delineating the intravitreal pharmacokinetics of GCV (Henry et al, 1987;Ashton et al, 1992;Morlet et al, 1996). The major constraint to the development and assessment of posterior segment pharmacokinetics of drugs in animal models is the inaccessibility of the ocular fluids for continuous serial sampling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to ganciclovir or acyclovir and in those with active bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal eye infections and severe thrombocytopenia. [9][10][11] In a phase III trial of 188 AIDS subjects with newly diagnosed CMV retinitis, Martin et al demonstrated that the time to disease progression was significantly delayed (216 days) in patients who received Vitrasert compared with those on intravenous ganciclovir treatment (104 days). 12 However, more recent studies suggest that, in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, a ganciclovir implant device is less effective than systemic therapy at decreasing disease dissemination and improving patient survival.…”
Section: Intraocular/intravitreal Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these most promising developments are intravitreal drug delivery devices designed to deliver drugs with precision directly to the vitreous, retina, and choroid. 74,75 Intravitreal Implantable Device Technology Implantable sustained-release intravitreal device technology has being given much impetus due to the perceptible benefits afforded over the use of topical eye-drops, systemic drug administration and direct intravitreal injections as modes of drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye as described earlier. 64,76 Solid biocompatible implantable devices for sustained or controlled intravitreal drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye have been developed employing diverse approaches and includes the use of implantable devices such as osmotic mini-pumps, nonbioerodible and bioerodible drug-loaded pellets, configured capillary fibers, biodegradable scleral plugs, scleral discs, polymeric matrices and scaffolds of various geometries providing unique mechanisms of drug release for the delivery of drugs to the posterior segment of the eye.…”
Section: The Blood-ocular Barriers: An Impediment To Intraocular Drugmentioning
confidence: 99%