2014
DOI: 10.2478/s11534-014-0505-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic classes in the Union of European Football Associations soccer team ranking

Abstract: Abstract:A strong structural regularity of classes is found in soccer teams ranked by the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) for the time interval 2009-2014. It concerns 424 to 453 teams according to the 5 competition seasons. The analysis is based on the rank-size theory considerations, the size being the UEFA coefficient at the end of a season. Three classes emerge: (i) the few "top" teams, (ii) 300 teams, (iii) the rest of the involved teams (about 150) in the tail of the distribution. There are… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, from a strictly numerical point of view, the γ exponent (≈1) is reminiscent of Zipf's finding about the "least effort law", also understood as an equilibrium process (Zipf, 1949). However, more modernly, it can be understood as resulting from a "self-organizing process" of complex systems, in fact, as recently discussed in a set of papers about soccer team and country ranking (Ausloos, 2014;Ausloos et al, 2014aAusloos et al, , 2014b. The UEFA and FIFA ranking rules lead to a dissipative structure process (Prigogine and Nicolis, 1967), which ends in a stable "dissipative structure" characterized by an "equilibrium exponent" ≈1.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, from a strictly numerical point of view, the γ exponent (≈1) is reminiscent of Zipf's finding about the "least effort law", also understood as an equilibrium process (Zipf, 1949). However, more modernly, it can be understood as resulting from a "self-organizing process" of complex systems, in fact, as recently discussed in a set of papers about soccer team and country ranking (Ausloos, 2014;Ausloos et al, 2014aAusloos et al, , 2014b. The UEFA and FIFA ranking rules lead to a dissipative structure process (Prigogine and Nicolis, 1967), which ends in a stable "dissipative structure" characterized by an "equilibrium exponent" ≈1.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again on the UEFA data, we also mention Ausloos et al (2014b) in which the authors discuss the possibility of finding dissipative structures, as in open systems acquiring (and losing) energy. In Ausloos et al (2014a), the authors present the rank-size relationships for the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) and UEFA rankings to assess ranking differences in terms of the FIFA's and UEFA's coefficients. More recently, Yoon and Sedaghat (2020)'s authors use the ranksize law to fit the ranked attendance data for the games in Major League Baseball (MLB); National Baseball Association (NBA), National Football League (NFL), and National Hockey League (NHL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of the two-parameter Discrete Generalized Beta Distribution (DGBD) (or Beta-like Rank Function or Cocho Rank Function) [1,2], a wide range of real-life data have been successfully fitted by this function [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Two questions naturally arise: first, what's the corresponding probability density function (pdf) of the DGBD?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%