2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319598110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic karyotype stability and gene copy number variations may have laid the foundation for tetraploid wheat formation

Abstract: Polyploidy or whole-genome duplication is recurrent in plant evolution, yet only a small fraction of whole-genome duplications has led to successful speciation. A major challenge in the establishment of nascent polyploids is sustained karyotype instability, which compromises fitness. The three putative diploid progenitors of bread wheat, with AA, SS (S ∼ B), and DD genomes occurred sympatrically, and their cross-fertilization in different combinations may have resulted in fertile allotetraploids with various g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
98
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rearrangements also largely followed a pattern where putatively homeologous segments were exchanged (only one out of the 53 translocations was an exception). These types of compensated changes were also found in synthetic neoallotetraploid B. napus (Xiong et al, 2011) and synthetic allotetraploid wheats (Zhang et al, 2013a). Thus, T. mirus provides another example in which alterations in parental gene balance appear to be tolerated more than alterations in total gene copy number, as expected based on the gene balance hypothesis (Birchler, 2012).…”
Section: Parental Divergencesupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rearrangements also largely followed a pattern where putatively homeologous segments were exchanged (only one out of the 53 translocations was an exception). These types of compensated changes were also found in synthetic neoallotetraploid B. napus (Xiong et al, 2011) and synthetic allotetraploid wheats (Zhang et al, 2013a). Thus, T. mirus provides another example in which alterations in parental gene balance appear to be tolerated more than alterations in total gene copy number, as expected based on the gene balance hypothesis (Birchler, 2012).…”
Section: Parental Divergencesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The trend towards underrepresentation of (intergenomic) translocation heterozygotes in T. mirus suggests some segregating translocations may be disadvantageous (Supplementary Tables S3-S8). In resynthesized allotetraploid B. napus and several allotetraploid wheats, lineages displaying the highest fertility were those that had the lowest number of alterations (Xiong et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Parental Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, aneuploidy is frequently associated with nascent polyploidization in plants (Xiong et al, 2011;Chester et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2013b); however, whether these are ephemeral by-products of wholegenome duplication or represent an important contributing factor to polyploid genome evolution, especially at the onset stage of polyploid formation, remains uninvestigated. However, the latter possibility is likely, given that, in contrast to nucleotide mutation, many types of aneuploidy can be readily reverted back to euploidy following subsequent meiotic segregation yet might as well impart their impacts (heritable variation in gene expression) to the euploid progeny (Henry et al, 2010;Gao et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic asymmetry for agronomically important traits has been reported among the three genomes (A, B and D) of common wheat (Feldman et al, 2012). Although Chinese Spring wheat (a natural hexaploid wheat) is estimated to have lost 10,000 to 16,000 genes after allohexaploidization (Brenchley et al, 2012), the structural changes found in the hexaploid genomes had mainly occurred at the tetraploid stage (Zhang et al, 2013). Furthermore, based on the wheat syntenome, Pont et al (2013) reported overdominance of the D genome against the tetraploid genome (AABB) after the second allohexaploidization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%