2009
DOI: 10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181ab822d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic Problems of the Nuclear Shape Factor Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these reports, the degree of nuclear roundness was evaluated using nuclear area and square value of the perimeter (4 × π × nuclear area/ [perimeter] 2 ). Metze et al [19] indicated that the square value of the nuclear perimeter may considerably change with even small errors of measurements, resulting in poor reliability. We used maximum Feret diameter (maximum caliper) instead of the perimeter as one of the variables, which could improve data reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these reports, the degree of nuclear roundness was evaluated using nuclear area and square value of the perimeter (4 × π × nuclear area/ [perimeter] 2 ). Metze et al [19] indicated that the square value of the nuclear perimeter may considerably change with even small errors of measurements, resulting in poor reliability. We used maximum Feret diameter (maximum caliper) instead of the perimeter as one of the variables, which could improve data reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In routine cytological preparations fractal derived variables are much less dependent on staining variations than variables derived from the grey-level co-occurrence matrix [61]. Form factors, which are classically used for the quantitative description of irregular outlines, depend highly on the magnification scale, whereas fractals are scale independent [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, this procedure may modify considerably highly grey level-dependent texture features and thus masquerade real differences in staining intensity. Morphometric and texture features 8,9 were calculated and plotted against the loss of the nuclear area, which reached up to 30% of the original area. 7 2.…”
Section: Robust Variables In Texture Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%