Comunicação Científica E Técnica Em Odontologia 2 2019
DOI: 10.22533/at.ed.26519290320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introdução À Metodologia “Mais Identidade”: Próteses Faciais 3d Com a Utilização De Tecnologias Acessíveis Para Pacientes Sobreviventes De Câncer No Rosto

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study's intent was not to compare accuracy of physical anatomical reproductions from virtual 3D models, [5,6,11], as previous investigators have compared stereophotogrammetry methods with monoscopic photogrammetry through a smartphone method, and found no statistically significant difference between the two methods [14], The authors of the present study suggest a reproducible and predictable protocol for image capture when utilizing monoscopic photogrammetry [4,8]. In this study we defined a reproducible workflow for further processing of 3D models of the human face, using standardized protocols [7] and using native tools from graphic & computer science modifiers like multiresolution and displacement with OrtogOnBlender in order to achieve more realistic details and reproducible characteristics of skin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study's intent was not to compare accuracy of physical anatomical reproductions from virtual 3D models, [5,6,11], as previous investigators have compared stereophotogrammetry methods with monoscopic photogrammetry through a smartphone method, and found no statistically significant difference between the two methods [14], The authors of the present study suggest a reproducible and predictable protocol for image capture when utilizing monoscopic photogrammetry [4,8]. In this study we defined a reproducible workflow for further processing of 3D models of the human face, using standardized protocols [7] and using native tools from graphic & computer science modifiers like multiresolution and displacement with OrtogOnBlender in order to achieve more realistic details and reproducible characteristics of skin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In this study, we explored the computational capabilities of visualization and processing of the Add-On OrtogOnBlender for optimizing 3D models of faces. Our results demonstrated that this software functionality enables more efficient and high-quality rendering, modeling, visualization, and animation of volumetric data, significantly enhancing the output of 3D photogrammetry software [7,10,11]. Stereophotogrammetry, monoscopic photogrammetry and structured light processes can achieve a colored, volumetric model of the skin of faces with accuracy, reproducibility, and with proportional integrity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This discrepancy in capturing the actual color of the patient's skin can lead to errors, with the prosthesis having to be remade, incurring higher material cost and a longer time to complete the work. These discrepancies may be even more important when 3D digital workflows, which include 3D models of faces obtained by optical resources, will evolve into color 3D printing for final facial prosthesis delivery, like the PlusID (+ID) methodology which uses smartphones and "UV maps" from monoscopic photogrammetry to obtain the color information of the face of the patient [11,12]. In view of the high cost of these instruments for accurate color capture, they are not widely used in rehabilitation centers, especially in those with fewer investments.…”
Section: Clinical Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%