Introducing Dyadic Interviews as a Method for Collecting Qualitative Data

Abstract

In dyadic interviews, two participants interact in response to open-ended research questions. There are few precedents for using dyadic interviews as a technique for qualitative research. We introduce this method largely in comparison to focus groups, because both represent forms of interactive interviewing. We do not, however, view dyadic interviews as miniature focus groups, and treat them as generating their own opportunities and issues. To illustrate the nature of dyadic interviewing, we present summaries of three studies using this method. In the first study, we used dyadic interviews and photovoice techniques to examine experiences of people with early-stage dementia. In the second study, we explored the experiences of staff who provided services to elderly housing residents. In the third study, we examined barriers and facilitators to substance abuse treatment among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Hawaii. We conclude with a discussion of directions for future research using dyadic interviews.

The lived experience with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a qualitative study

“…This study had a qualitative descriptive design using in-depth dyadic interviews with IPF patients and family caregivers [15,16]. Dyadic interviews draw on the interdependence of two informants as a source of information during data generation.…”

“…Dyadic interviews draw on the interdependence of two informants as a source of information during data generation. Of the different forms of dyadic interviews, we chose joint interviews with both members of the dyad ( patient/family caregiver) simultaneously [15,16]. Conducting joint dyadic interviews prompts the couple to inspire, contrast and support each other in telling their story, and to refresh each other's ability to recall past events.…”

“…Inclusion criteria were IPF patients older than 40 years diagnosed according to international guidelines [2]. Family caregivers were individuals older than 18 years who had the same access to information as the patient [16].…”

How Beliefs About Bladder Dysfunction Among Health-Care Professionals Influence Clinical Practice Development

“…This qualitative study involved a combination of focus groups 12 and dyadic 13 and telephone interviews. Focus groups were deemed most appropriate; however, this was not possible due to a low response rate and a nationwide dispersal of participants.…”

The implementation of case formulation by probation officers: service user and carer views

“…McClelland and newell (2008) describe similar constraints and use the label 'focus group' with just two people, as it is the opportunity for (and realisation of ) interaction that is key. Morgan, Ataie, Carder, and Hoffman (2013) point out the paucity of research around the use of two-person (un-acquainted) interviews as a viable alternative to focus groups or individual interviews. Morgan, (2013) research uses 'dyadic interviews' (with individuals who are pre-acquainted, such as couples or friends) and highlight the opportunity for interaction; they position this as similar to focus groups, but suggest there are pertinent differences, as the type of discussion that takes place may be different to the dynamic of a larger group.…”