2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing frequency representation into convolution neural networks for medical image segmentation via twin-Kernel Fourier convolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our approach, we contemplate a strategy for image detail recovery, whereby we introduce the adoption of an upsampling methodology rooted in the frequency domain representation [33]. This strategy selectively reconstitutes image details during the restoration of image details, embodying a distinctive attribute within the upsampling procedure.…”
Section: Spectrum Upsampling Block(sub)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our approach, we contemplate a strategy for image detail recovery, whereby we introduce the adoption of an upsampling methodology rooted in the frequency domain representation [33]. This strategy selectively reconstitutes image details during the restoration of image details, embodying a distinctive attribute within the upsampling procedure.…”
Section: Spectrum Upsampling Block(sub)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…achieved in the spatial domain. In this segment, we embrace an alternative strategy for upsampling, which involves the introduction of a method based on frequency domain representation [33], thereby substituting conventional techniques such as interpolation and transposed convolution.…”
Section: Algorithm 2 Spectrum Upsampingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the application of high-frequency and low-frequency features in images have become the main research direction, and high-frequency and low-frequency features can also be called local information and global information. These algorithms 30 – 32 use different methods to separate global and local features. The difference between local and global components is that global information contains the global shape and structure of the image, while local information pays more attention to the texture change of the image.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the application of high-frequency and low-frequency features in images have become the main research direction, and high-frequency and low-frequency features can also be called local information and global information. These algorithms [30][31][32] MBSNet draws on the concept of high and low-frequency information capture and combination, but the difference is that we use dilated convolution and average pooling operations to obtain global features, and only supplement local information with global information in the encoder stage, while local information does not combine global information. This is done to learn more about pure semantic information and reduce network complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Additional inputs: In addition to color space transformations, recent works incorporate more focused and domain-specific inputs to the segmentation models, such as Fourier domain representation using the discrete Fourier transform (Tang et al, 2021b) and inputs based on the physics of skin illumination and imaging (Abhishek et al, 2020).…”
Section: Image Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%