2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-93851-4_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing Preferences over NFPs into Service Selection in SOA

Abstract: When implementing a business or software activity in SOA, a match is sought between the required functionality and that provided by a web service. In selecting services to perform a certain business functionality, often only hard constraints are considered. However, client requirements over QoS or other NFP types are often soft and allow tradeoffs. We use a graphical language for specifying hard constraints, preferences and tradeoffs over NFPs as well as service level objectives (SLO). In particular, we use th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last five years, many exiting works have focused on heterogeneous QoS preferences for atomic service selection, for example, QoS-Aware service selection [23], [41], qualitative preferences oriented service selection [47], and the combination of qualitative/quantitative preference for service selection [48].…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last five years, many exiting works have focused on heterogeneous QoS preferences for atomic service selection, for example, QoS-Aware service selection [23], [41], qualitative preferences oriented service selection [47], and the combination of qualitative/quantitative preference for service selection [48].…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pierre Châtel et al [49] proposed a LCP-net to model linguistic NFPs preference statements for service selection. Schröpfer et al [48] use UCP-net to model user preferences over the attribute values quantitatively, and they use TCP-net to assign relative importance and conditional relative importance between NFPs qualitatively.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schropfer et al [23] have recently proposed a TCP-net based formulation of qualitative user preferences over non-functional attributes for ranking and selecting individual services. In contrast, the focus of TCP-Compose is on the assembly of a set of composite services that constitute a non-dominated set with respect to a set of user-specified preferences and tradeoffs over non-functional attributes.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3], an expressive and user-friendly preference model was proposed, which considers both qualitative and quantitative preferences, as well as atomic and composite preferences. In [10], qualitative preferences can be defined using the TCP network, which can handle the conditional preferences and relative importance of various non-functional properties, and quantitative preferences can be defined as utilities using the UCP network. Currently our paper only considers 2 types of user preferences and does not consider the relative importance of different properties.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%