Introducing the transformative service mediator: value creation with vulnerable consumers

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify the role of mediators in supporting value co-creation for vulnerable consumers in a service context. The authors propose that in transformative services, the roles of actor mediators facilitate control and empowerment for the vulnerable consumer – labelling these transformative service mediators (TSMs). Design/methodology/approach The authors develop a theoretical framework for the activities of mediators in value co-creation considering the interrelationships of vulnerability, structure and agency. The authors then use Prahalad and Ramaswamy’s DART (Dialogue, Access, Risk Assessment and Transparency) model as the integrating framework to describe the TSM roles in the context of the foster care service ecosystem. Findings The authors introduce a future research agenda regarding TSM roles in transformational service experiences and value co-creation with vulnerable consumers. Service researchers and providers are encouraged to explore effective training and motivation of TSMs. Research limitations/implications Understanding value co-creation for vulnerable consumers is an emerging area in service research. The TSM concept introduces a new approach to explore how value co-creation and transformative outcomes can be enhanced in service contexts where consumers experience vulnerability. Practical implications This paper presents an agenda for future research. The outcomes of future research based on TSM roles may help guide service providers in identifying opportunities for enhancing well-being and reducing vulnerability in service delivery. Originality/value This paper suggests that exploring the role of TSMs in the service process offers new insights into reducing vulnerability in service relationships.

Combining Direct and Indirect Measurements to Assess Patients’ Satisfaction with the Quality of Public Health Services in Romania: Uncovering Structural Mechanisms and Their Implications

“…We measured patients' satisfaction by the category of services (henceforth SCS), referring, in particular, to family physicians, specialists, hospital services, and laboratories. The process of value creation in vulnerable customers is important [42], and previous research showed that competent delivery of professional health services develops trust (henceforth TRUST) in patients [43]. As a result, the final nine hypotheses were as follows: Hypothesis 8 (H8).…”

Actor transformation in service: a process model for vulnerable consumers

“…Unlike the findings by Johns and Davey (2019), the resource transmission of quasi-actors is not limited to mediation between providers and consumers but refers to broader and more general support behaviors. Frow et al (2016) argued that actors cocreate a new resource through resource sharing.…”

Autonomy or Security? Core Value Trade-Offs and Spillovers in Servicescapes for Vulnerable Customers

“…Our second contribution addresses the calls to include the multistakeholder perspective in TSR (cf. S. Anderson, Nasr, and Rayburn 2018;Johns and Davey 2019;McColl-Kennedy, Cheung, and Coote 2020) and in servicescapes (Pizam and Tasci 2019) in particular. We showed how core value trade-offs experienced by one customer create a ripple effect and spillovers in others (see Figure 2).…”