2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10746-015-9344-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Theories that are grounded in empirical data show that we live in a world with multiple forms of rationalities (Lamont, 2012;Cefaï et al, 2015). In this paper, we argue that the Aracaju beach bar sub-field is a bazaar of rationalities that are important to the tourism market: Word of Mouth, Expert Recommendation, and Independent Online Review.…”
Section: The Bazaar Of Economic Evaluation Rationalities In Tourism M...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Theories that are grounded in empirical data show that we live in a world with multiple forms of rationalities (Lamont, 2012;Cefaï et al, 2015). In this paper, we argue that the Aracaju beach bar sub-field is a bazaar of rationalities that are important to the tourism market: Word of Mouth, Expert Recommendation, and Independent Online Review.…”
Section: The Bazaar Of Economic Evaluation Rationalities In Tourism M...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thinking about valuation, therefore, is not just an academic exercise, it has practical consequences for the world we live in Kjellberg et al (2013). Such is the significance of valuation practices argue Cefai et al (2015), that valuation as a subject should not be considered as simply a subdiscipline of sociology, but rather as a perspective that is common to all aspects of the social sciences.…”
Section: The Sociology Of Valuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It currently provides the thematic framework for a plethora of different empirical phenomena (Cefaï et al, 2015;Kjellberg and Mallard, 2013;Krueger and Reinhart, 2017;Lamont, 2012). These range from the attribution of monetary or ideational value to material or immaterial goods, such as art (Beckert and Roessel, 2013;Hutter and Throsby, 2008;Karpik, 2010), nature (Fourcade, 2011a(Fourcade, , 2011bThévenot et al, 2000), or human life (Hood, 2017;Zelizer, 1979) to research on formalized evaluation processes, such as credit or hotel ratings (Fourcade and Healy, 2013;Jeacle and Carter, 2011;Orlikowski and Scott, 2014;Scott and Orlikowski, 2012) or university rankings (Espeland and Sauder, 2007;Espeland, 2009, 2016).…”
Section: The 'Booming Field' Of a Sociology Of Valuation And Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They therefore argue that the aim of valuation studies should be to discuss, before all, what value and valuation are about. Daniel Cefaï et al (2015), too, search for an integrative approach as 'a focus of perspective, transversal to all the social sciences ' (2015: 2). They emphasize that a 'sociology of valuation and evaluation is not only concerned with a specific sector of social life or a minor segment of grand theories' but rather 'opens an intellectual space in which core issues in the social sciences such as interaction, agency, values, norms, collective action, and the role of institutions are discussed ' Cefaï et al, 2015: 6).…”
Section: The 'Booming Field' Of a Sociology Of Valuation And Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%