The Political Economy of Decentralization in Sub-Saharan Africa 2012
DOI: 10.1596/9780821396131_intro
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hicken, 2009). Reliable data is, however, not generally available for Africa (See the restricted sample of Dafflon et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hicken, 2009). Reliable data is, however, not generally available for Africa (See the restricted sample of Dafflon et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the problems of decentralization are well known. Scholars have found, for example, that decentralization has not reached its theoretically purported benefits because of political and bureaucratic resistances from the centre (Crook, ), recentralization (Wunsch, ), lack of local capacity (Fiszbein, ), inadequate transfer of responsibilities and resources (unfunded mandates) (Andersson, Gibson, & Lehoucq, ) and gap between rhetoric and implementation (Dafflon, Hugounenq, & Madiès, ; Gaynor, ). Despite mixed empirical record, decentralization remains a popular policy partly because, rightly or wrongly, it invokes notions of democracy, improved delivery of government services and economic development (Eaton, Kaiser, & Smoke, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%