2016
DOI: 10.1215/1089201x-3698947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Abstract: Mana Kia and Afshin Marashi's introduction asks the main question that the articles in the special section “After the Persianate” endeavor to answer: How should we write the histories of societies that emerged from the Persianate ecumene in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Held together in this light, questions emerge on the relationship between knowledge and power, across and between centers and peripheries. In the traditional, often romanticized conception of cosmopolitanism, shared languages and identities like Persian create a cultural and political order that transcends the local, obfuscating centers and peripheries as points of reference (Pollock 2006: 10; Kia and Marashi 2016: 380). During the Soviet anti-cosmopolitanism campaign, however, many of the measures taken to ostracize kosmopolity from society involved regular monitoring of peripheral Soviet nations from Soviet centers like Moscow, exporting Russian cultural figures to the peripheries to help shape new national identities and cultures there, and sidelining “rootless” intellectuals who did not associate closely enough to a national, socialist identity (Tomoff 2004).…”
Section: Cosmopolitanism and Orientalism In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Held together in this light, questions emerge on the relationship between knowledge and power, across and between centers and peripheries. In the traditional, often romanticized conception of cosmopolitanism, shared languages and identities like Persian create a cultural and political order that transcends the local, obfuscating centers and peripheries as points of reference (Pollock 2006: 10; Kia and Marashi 2016: 380). During the Soviet anti-cosmopolitanism campaign, however, many of the measures taken to ostracize kosmopolity from society involved regular monitoring of peripheral Soviet nations from Soviet centers like Moscow, exporting Russian cultural figures to the peripheries to help shape new national identities and cultures there, and sidelining “rootless” intellectuals who did not associate closely enough to a national, socialist identity (Tomoff 2004).…”
Section: Cosmopolitanism and Orientalism In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%