Outcome Measurement in Mental Health 2010
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511760686.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence suggests that discrepancies can exist between clients' perception of symptom severity and therapist ratings and standardized assessment measures (Cairns et al, 2010). However, self-reports in the field of mental health are seen as invaluable tools that provide insight into mental health-related symptoms and characteristics that may not be readily apparent to clinicians (Trauer, 2010). For example, the OQ-45 has been shown to accurately identify and predict treatment outcomes (Lambert, 2010).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that discrepancies can exist between clients' perception of symptom severity and therapist ratings and standardized assessment measures (Cairns et al, 2010). However, self-reports in the field of mental health are seen as invaluable tools that provide insight into mental health-related symptoms and characteristics that may not be readily apparent to clinicians (Trauer, 2010). For example, the OQ-45 has been shown to accurately identify and predict treatment outcomes (Lambert, 2010).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) has become increasingly important in the mental health care sector. Although there is no universal definition, ROM can be described as the use of standard instruments to systematically and continuously assess aspects of mental health service users’ health for the purpose of better aiding their care [ 1 ]. The format of ROM varies between countries, but it usually consists of several quantitative measures used to assess a service user’s physical, psychological, and social condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%