“…The second entails a type of immanent critique of canonical texts to identify the more or less implicit conceptions of women, femininity and gender relations (Sydie, 1994;Felski, 1995;Marshall;Witz, 2004;Chaboud-Rychter et al, 2014). The third set of approaches are linked to the sociology of knowledge, or an intellectual history, and emphasize the biographical and social dimensions of constructing theory, including the personal relationships of the canonical male theorists with women and other gender-related experiences (Gane, 1993;Ketler;Meja, 1993;Deegan, 1991;Cross, 2020;Harding, 2021). A fourth approach involves the dissemination and analysis of the thought of women authors who have been rendered invisible or erased from the history of sociological thought, with an emphasis on those who published between the 1830s and 1930s, such as Flora Tristán, Harriet Martineau, Jane Addams, Anna Julia Cooper, Beatrix Potter Webb, Marianne Weber, among others (for example, Lengermann; Niebrugge, 2007; Deegan, 1988b; Mata, 2014; Daflon; Sorj, 2021; Alcantara, 2021; Campos, 2021; Santana et al, 2021;Zanon et al, 2022).…”