Reclaiming Indigenous Research in Higher Education
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1v2xw7v.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one representative example of this approach, a participant wrote, “to be a culturally responsive researcher means my voice is the voice of all [minoritized] people.” This perspective is quite different from the participants who centered their own communities and articulated clear engagement with these communities as the center of their own CRR practice. Participants in these examples talked about how “epistemologically, [CRR] means that knowledge is coconstructed” and about the ways in which CRR works “to involve participants and community members as coconstructors of the research.” These perspectives mirror existing CRR research approaches that urge “scholars to be responsive to their communities and create positive social change” (Minthorn & Shotton, 2018, p. 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In one representative example of this approach, a participant wrote, “to be a culturally responsive researcher means my voice is the voice of all [minoritized] people.” This perspective is quite different from the participants who centered their own communities and articulated clear engagement with these communities as the center of their own CRR practice. Participants in these examples talked about how “epistemologically, [CRR] means that knowledge is coconstructed” and about the ways in which CRR works “to involve participants and community members as coconstructors of the research.” These perspectives mirror existing CRR research approaches that urge “scholars to be responsive to their communities and create positive social change” (Minthorn & Shotton, 2018, p. 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Despite feeling largely unsupported by their administrations, they increased the general knowledge of the institution. Moreover, their sense of responsibility required emotional labor like that described in Ambo (2018), Minthorn and Chávez (2015), and Kenny and Fraser (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Further, advancement into top-tier academic positions is slower for women than for men, women are paid less money than men at the same rank, and women receive fewer national awards and prizes (Catalyst, 2021;Valian, 2009). This lack of parity also becomes more pronounced for women of color (Kobayashi, 2009) and Indigenous women in the academy (Lavallée, 2020;Minthorn, 2018;Minthorn & Shotton, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%