2012
DOI: 10.1039/9781849732925-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction and Conclusion: The Rationale for Thresholds for Genotoxic Carcinogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When stem cells divide, they become exposed to unavoidable and carcinogen-mediated DNA alterations that increase their risk of malignant transformation . Second, repetitive and accumulated carcinogenic insult may result in carcinogenesis, whereas physiological homeostasis would be effective under conditions such as episodic alcohol exposure . Chronic exposure to acetaldehyde resulting from frequent drinking can lead to the formation of DNA adducts and induces chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When stem cells divide, they become exposed to unavoidable and carcinogen-mediated DNA alterations that increase their risk of malignant transformation . Second, repetitive and accumulated carcinogenic insult may result in carcinogenesis, whereas physiological homeostasis would be effective under conditions such as episodic alcohol exposure . Chronic exposure to acetaldehyde resulting from frequent drinking can lead to the formation of DNA adducts and induces chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because of conservative assumptions that increase risk, such as low‐dose linearity and the assumption that animal carcinogens are likely to be human carcinogens, our risk calculations are upper‐bound hypothetical estimates. For example, the use of the LNT model is likely to overestimate the actual risks of MTBE because of MTBE's lack of genotoxicity (Greim & Albertini, 2012; Aschner et al., 2016) and because the positive cancer findings reported in animal bioassays with MTBE are either not reliable (e.g., LCTs, leukemias/lymphomas, and astrocytomas) or likely not relevant to humans (i.e., kidney tumors in male rats and liver cancer in female mice). Including these endpoints in our analysis results in a very conservative analysis that is likely to overstate risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the ED 10 values and LED 10 values using an LMS model in US EPA's Benchmark Dose Software (Version 2.6.0.1) (US EPA, 2016). The use of the LNT model is likely to overestimate the actual MTBE risks because of MTBE's lack of genotoxicity (Greim & Albertini, 2012; Aschner et al., 2016).…”
Section: Mos Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, replicative DNA polymerases readily bypass the HdU lesion, preferentially incorporating dAMP [2,7]. HdU found in double-helical DNA is potentially mutagenic [6,7,8] and not cytotoxic [9]. Interestingly, several enzymes from human cells capable of removing HdU lesions from DNA have been described [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%