2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction and geographic availability of new antibiotics approved between 1999 and 2014

Abstract: BackgroundDespite the urgent need for new, effective antibiotics, few antibiotics of value have entered the market during the past decades. Therefore, incentives have been developed to stimulate antibiotic R&D. For these incentives to be effective, geographic availability for recently approved antibiotics needs to be better understood. In this study, we analyze geographic availability and market introduction of antibiotics approved between 1999 and 2014.Material and methodWe identified antibiotics, considered … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a significant problem in many clinical settings and the antibiotic-resistant forms are classified as a “High Priority” pathogen by the World Health Organization (WHO) [6] and a “Serious Threat” by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [7]. Since 1999, nine antibiotics targeting methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have been approved (linezolid, daptomycin, tigecycline, ceftobiprole, telavancin, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, tedizolid) [8]. Of these, only the oxazolidinones, now nearly 20 years old, were a completely new class [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a significant problem in many clinical settings and the antibiotic-resistant forms are classified as a “High Priority” pathogen by the World Health Organization (WHO) [6] and a “Serious Threat” by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [7]. Since 1999, nine antibiotics targeting methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have been approved (linezolid, daptomycin, tigecycline, ceftobiprole, telavancin, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, tedizolid) [8]. Of these, only the oxazolidinones, now nearly 20 years old, were a completely new class [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Side effects such as renal toxicity and cross-resistance (e.g. among glyo- and lipoglycopeptides) can limit clinical use [8]. Moreover, many antibiotics have reduced efficacy against Staphylococcus spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers and clinicians are faced with the urgent need to develop novel scaffolds and effective antibacterial drugs to overcome AMR emergence and spreading of MDR strains [5,6]. The opportunistic human pathogens that exhibit multidrug resistance, like Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp., known as ESKAPE pathogens, are considered as a serious global health issue [7,8]. Among them, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represents the leading cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections, being recognized by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as the antibiotic-resistant pathogen of high priority.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), are frequently isolated in hospital environments, where they are responsible for the majority of nosocomial infections [5]. In particular, Gram-positive bacteria have predominantly developed resistance to all the available antibiotics and pose a serious problem not only in hospitals but also for the general population [6,7]. Infections of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are of particular concern [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%