BackgroundDespite the urgent need for new, effective antibiotics, few antibiotics of value have entered the market during the past decades. Therefore, incentives have been developed to stimulate antibiotic R&D. For these incentives to be effective, geographic availability for recently approved antibiotics needs to be better understood. In this study, we analyze geographic availability and market introduction of antibiotics approved between 1999 and 2014.Material and methodWe identified antibiotics, considered new chemical entities (NCEs) for systemic use approved globally between 1999 and 2014, from national medicine agencies’ lists of approved drugs, and data from the WHO Collaborating Center for Drug Statistics. Geographic availability was mapped using sales data from IQVIA, and analyzed with regards to class, indication, safety, and origin.ResultsOf the 25 identified NCEs, only 12 had registered sales in more than 10 countries. NCEs with the widest geographic availability had registered sales in more than 70 countries within a ten-year timeframe and 30 countries within a three-year timeframe, spreading across five different geographic regions and three country income classes. Half (52%) of the NCEs had an indication for infections caused by antibiotic- resistant bacteria, little diversity was seen regarding target pathogen and indication. Antibiotics originated from and/or marketed by companies from the US or Europe had greater geographic availability compared to Japanese antibiotics, which seldom reached outside of Asia. For 20 NCEs developers chose to fully or partially sublicense marketing rights to a number of companies of different sizes.ConclusionOur findings show great variation in geographic availability of antibiotics, indicating that availability in multiple regions and country income classes is possible, but rarely seen within a few years of market authorization. Sublicensing agreements between multiple companies was common practice. Moreover, differences were seen between countries regarding benefit/risk evaluations and company behavior. These findings could be a potential source of uncertainties, and create barriers to assure that working antibiotics are developed and made available according to public health needs.

When patented, brand-name antibiotics lose market exclusivity, generics typically enter the market at lower prices, which may increase consumption of the drug. To examine the effect of generic market entry on antibiotic consumption in the United States, we conducted an interrupted time series analysis of the change in the number of prescriptions per month for antibiotics for which at least one generic entered the US market between 2000 and 2012. Data were acquired from the IQVIA Xponent database. Thirteen antibiotics were analyzed. Here, we show that one year after generic entry, the number of prescriptions increased for five antibiotics (5 to 406%)—aztreonam, cefpodoxime, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin—and decreased for one drug: cefdinir. These changes were sustained two years after. Cefprozil, cefuroxime axetil and clarithromycin had significant increases in trend, but no significant level changes. No consistent pattern for antibiotic use following generic entry in the United States was observed.

showed a lack of novelty and diversity regarding target pathogens and indications and a failure to address the most urgent resistance threats, including resistant Gram-negative bacteria. A global research and development strategy should incentivize development of broad-spectrum antibiotics for critically ill patients, as well as therapeutic alternatives to antibiotics, decreasing our dependence on traditional, small-molecule antibiotics.C oncerns about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) have been voiced since the 1940s when antibiotics were first used to treat patients, 1 but only recently has AMR become recognized as a global health threat. Antibiotic use, an important driver of antibiotic resistance, is increasing globally. This increase is a consequence of rising populations and incomes, and the background burden of infectious disease caused by lack of access to public health, clean water and sanitation. 2 Therefore, in addition to reducing irresponsible and unnecessary use of antibiotics, a crucial part of a global strategy to combat AMR is measures to prevent the development and spread of infectious diseases, including through incentives for new antibiotics and vaccines. 3 Antibiotic development has slowed considerably during the past 30 years, with few new antibiotics reaching the market. 4 Reasons for this decline include scientific challenges to discovering new antibiotic compounds and bacterial targets, barriers to successfully conducting clinical trials, high levels of competition from already approved antibiotics, and the risk that new antibiotics will become inefficient within a few years of market entry due to resistance. 5,6 A recent analysis of antibiotics for systemic use approved between 1999 and 2014, conducted by researchers at the