Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
A B S T R A C T . The article examines Scottish discussions surrounding the French revolutionary wars in the early and mid-s. It argues that these discussions were not built along the lines of the dispute that set Burke against the English radicals, because arguments about French 'cosmopolitan' love for mankind were largely irrelevant in the context of Smithian moral philosophy. The Scottish writers who observed French developments in the period (including the Edinburgh Moderates, James Mackintosh, John Millar, and Lord Lauderdale) were, however, particularly interested in what they interpreted as France's changing notion of patriotism, and built upon the heritage of Smithian moral philosophy in order to offer original and powerful commentaries of French national feeling and warfare. They identified the 'enthusiastic' nature of French national sentiment, and the replacement of traditional patriotism with a new form of relationship between the individual and the nation, as the most significant and dangerous element to come out of the French Revolution.This article aims to uncover various strands of Scottish political thought concerning the evolution of warfare and national feelings during the French revolutionary wars (-).The impact of the French Revolution on British political thought has long formed an object of study for scholars, with much of the interest focusing on the dispute that set Edmund Burke against the Whig and radical defenders of the Revolution. The events in France after , it is argued, lent added weight to Burke's devastating critique of the French philosophes, and largely discredited both the languages of republicanism and natural rights in Britain. This article, however, approaches the question of the British reception of the French Revolution from a different angle: it is not directly concerned with the disputes surrounding the French political and social reforms, but rather with the contemporary perceptions and understanding of the transformations in * I am grateful to Julian Hoppit, Phil Withington and the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the SSFH Annual Conference in and the Voltaire Foundation in . I am also grateful to Gareth Stedman Jones for his encouragement and comments. J. G. A. Pocock, Virtue, commerce and history (Cambridge, ), pp. -; Gregory Claeys, The French Revolution debate in Britain: the origins of modern politics (Basingtoke, ), pp. , . Christ Church, St Aldates, Oxford OX OP anna.plassart@chch.ox.ac.uk The Historical Journal, , (), pp. - © Cambridge University Press doi:./SX warfare, national feeling, and international relations that marked the period. These transformations were arguably as revolutionary as the social and political upheavals of the s, and have themselves been the focus of much scholarly attention; yet the contemporary reflections they attracted in Britain have remained mostly unexplored. T...
A B S T R A C T . The article examines Scottish discussions surrounding the French revolutionary wars in the early and mid-s. It argues that these discussions were not built along the lines of the dispute that set Burke against the English radicals, because arguments about French 'cosmopolitan' love for mankind were largely irrelevant in the context of Smithian moral philosophy. The Scottish writers who observed French developments in the period (including the Edinburgh Moderates, James Mackintosh, John Millar, and Lord Lauderdale) were, however, particularly interested in what they interpreted as France's changing notion of patriotism, and built upon the heritage of Smithian moral philosophy in order to offer original and powerful commentaries of French national feeling and warfare. They identified the 'enthusiastic' nature of French national sentiment, and the replacement of traditional patriotism with a new form of relationship between the individual and the nation, as the most significant and dangerous element to come out of the French Revolution.This article aims to uncover various strands of Scottish political thought concerning the evolution of warfare and national feelings during the French revolutionary wars (-).The impact of the French Revolution on British political thought has long formed an object of study for scholars, with much of the interest focusing on the dispute that set Edmund Burke against the Whig and radical defenders of the Revolution. The events in France after , it is argued, lent added weight to Burke's devastating critique of the French philosophes, and largely discredited both the languages of republicanism and natural rights in Britain. This article, however, approaches the question of the British reception of the French Revolution from a different angle: it is not directly concerned with the disputes surrounding the French political and social reforms, but rather with the contemporary perceptions and understanding of the transformations in * I am grateful to Julian Hoppit, Phil Withington and the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the SSFH Annual Conference in and the Voltaire Foundation in . I am also grateful to Gareth Stedman Jones for his encouragement and comments. J. G. A. Pocock, Virtue, commerce and history (Cambridge, ), pp. -; Gregory Claeys, The French Revolution debate in Britain: the origins of modern politics (Basingtoke, ), pp. , . Christ Church, St Aldates, Oxford OX OP anna.plassart@chch.ox.ac.uk The Historical Journal, , (), pp. - © Cambridge University Press doi:./SX warfare, national feeling, and international relations that marked the period. These transformations were arguably as revolutionary as the social and political upheavals of the s, and have themselves been the focus of much scholarly attention; yet the contemporary reflections they attracted in Britain have remained mostly unexplored. T...
This article addresses the role of Protestant military humanism in early Stuart Ireland. The central argument is that Protestant military humanism as embodied in the works of such authors as Geoffrey Gates (fl. 1566–80) and Barnabe Rich (1541–1617) played a vital role in the Jacobean plantation of Ulster. These authors combined a strong commitment to the Protestant religion with the conviction that martial virtue was essential for the preservation of the commonwealth against the threats of domestic rebellion and foreign domination. The example of the soldier-planter Sir Thomas Phillips of Limavady (c. 1560–1636) and his criticisms of the City of London's plantation in Derry during the 1620s demonstrates that military humanist values not only offered a persuasive rationale for colonization, but also significantly shaped the course of plantation on the ground. Phillips's lengthy conflict with the City of London demonstrated a fundamental disjuncture between his own Protestant military humanist outlook, and the City's own understanding of its civilizing mission in Ireland; however, rather than a conflict between aristocratic and civic values, close study reveals instead a struggle grounded in competing hierarchies of civic values.
La historia de las relaciones entre civiles y militares ha privilegiado la violencia de los segundos sobre los primeros por lo que sabemos poco sobre la violencia ejercida por civiles contra soldados. Este artículo se centra en ella examinando un corpus de pleitos sobre las agresiones sufridas por soldados a manos de agentes de la autoridad local, campesinos o trabajadores, en una nueva ciudad de frontera: la Pamplona del s. XVI. Este análisis muestra que la violencia civil sobre los soldados, más que una mera respuesta a sus abusos era el resultado de la incorporación de los militares al tejido social local, así como de la activa participación de los civiles en la configuración de las prácticas y normas que regulaban la interacción a ras de suelo entre civiles y militares.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.