Early Instructed Second Language Acquisition 2018
DOI: 10.21832/9781788922517-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
12

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
46
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, by providing scaffolds to language learners during social interaction in the classroom, a necessary factor for language acquisition takes place, hence language learning improvement. The study's findings further support this idea that CR instruction during which learners make intellectual efforts to grasp the rules (Ellis, 1990) is a facilitative instructional technique. However, the study's findings are mainly more supportive of DA than CR instruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, by providing scaffolds to language learners during social interaction in the classroom, a necessary factor for language acquisition takes place, hence language learning improvement. The study's findings further support this idea that CR instruction during which learners make intellectual efforts to grasp the rules (Ellis, 1990) is a facilitative instructional technique. However, the study's findings are mainly more supportive of DA than CR instruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…According to Ellis (1990), a CR task is a pedagogical activity in which students are given L2 data in some form and asked to conduct an operation on or with it to gain an explicit grasp of one or more linguistic aspects of the target language. The way Ellis (2003) sees it, explicit learning is the main foundation of CR tasks.…”
Section: Consciousness-raising Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zur Absicherung wäre hier natürlich eine deutlich größere Stichprobe und eine auf diese Frage hin zugeschnittene Methodik, die die Spracheinstellungen in der Erst-ebenso wie in der Zweitsprache berücksichtigt, notwendig.Eine mögliche Folge des mangelnden Fokus auf Form für den Erwerb von Variationsmustern kann des Weiteren darin beobachtet werden, dass Sprecher/-innen mit wenig Sprachunterricht und weniger Kontakten zu Autochthonen eher der Gruppe der Mischer/-innen angehören. Die implizite sprachliche Auseinandersetzung im natürlichen Kontext enthält kaum Interaktionen mit Fokussierung auf formale Details(Ellis 2008b). Ohne umfassenderen Einfluss von Sprachkursen -die üblicherweise auf Standard ausgerichtet sind -oder regelmäßiges Feedback von Autochthonen, die auf die Einhaltung der sprachlichen Normen und insbesondere das Differenzieren zwischen Dialekt und Standard Wert legen, scheinen formale Differenzkriterien in den Hintergrund zu rücken.…”
unclassified
“…Raum sind u.a. Krashen (1981), Ellis (1990), Byrnes (1998) und Kramsch (2000). (Henrici/Riemer 2007: 38ff.…”
Section: Erst-und Zweitsprachenerwerbsforschungunclassified